Lia Thomas Registers Two Wins in First Meet Since NCAA Meeting

lia-thomas, transgender, penn swimming, ncaa

Lia Thomas Registers Two Wins in First Meet Since NCAA Meeting

The University of Pennsylvania women’s team competed Saturday in its final Ivy League dual meet of the season as the Quakers traveled north to Harvard. The Crimson won by a final score of 187-113, but Lia Thomas did pick up two individual wins for Penn. Thomas won the 200 free in a swift 1:47.08, and she also placed first in the 100 free in 50.55. Thomas also provided a pair of 23-second relay splits on Penn’s 200 medley and 200 free relays.

Thomas was racing for the first time since an NCAA Board of Directors meeting that concluded with the organization announcing plans to adjust is transgender participation policies. The NCAA will now defer to the national governing bodies for each individual sport to determine the requirements for a transgender athlete to compete in women’s competition (in this case, USA Swimming), and tests of an athlete’s testosterone levels will be mandated four weeks prior to a championship event.

It is unclear if Thomas will meet any new requirements for measuring testosterone levels, but for the 2022 winter season, that restriction would only affect her participation in the NCAA Championships. She definitely will remain eligible to compete in dual meets and the Ivy League Championships because she met the NCAA’s previous rule about transgender participation, which only required an athlete to undergo one year of hormone-replacement therapy to be eligible.

Additionally, the NCAA’s release included a measure for “flexibility to allow for additional eligibility if a transgender student-athlete loses eligibility based on the policy change provided they meet the newly adopted standards,” so Thomas could still be exempted from the new policies which might otherwise rule her out of NCAAs.

Thomas owns the fastest times in the country this season in the 200 and 500 freestyle, and she is also among the top eight swimmers so far in the 1650 free.

View full results from the Harvard-Penn dual meet here.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

Welcome to our community. We invite you to join our discussion. Our community guidelines are simple: be respectful and constructive, keep on topic, and support your fellow commenters. Commenting signifies that you agree to our Terms of Use

9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Margie
Margie
2 years ago

Boycott NCAA championships if they don’t step up and fix this unfair situation!

Bterclinger
Bterclinger
2 years ago
Reply to  Margie

Completely agree. And the author and this publication need to stop normalizing this mental illness by calling him “her” and “she.”

Tony
Tony
2 years ago

Yes on the boycott of the NCAA Championships if they don’t step up & fix this UNFAIR situation!

Ms. Turner
Ms. Turner
2 years ago

How is it unfair. You sound like the fools that said I was taking trophies from women.

I shot competitive Trap. I shot my matches from a wheelchair while wearing a back brace. My competition was younger, perfectly healthy not in a wheelchair or wearing a back brace. And yet people like you said I had an unfair advantage. What a joke! Its really just hate and bigotry on your part and others making the same statements.

AH
AH
2 years ago
Reply to  Ms. Turner

Give me a break. How do you not see how this isn’t fair? A man competing as a woman. Your situation was different. Wake up!

Bterclinger
Bterclinger
2 years ago
Reply to  Ms. Turner

You just enjoy promoting mental illness,perversion and the elimination of Women’s sports. You’re the bigot here.

Luka Nox
Luka Nox
2 years ago
Reply to  Ms. Turner

Queen.

Roger Denlin
Roger Denlin
2 years ago

Sad that so many support forcing women to compete against males. Still they are a minority. Most Americans don’t want this at all, which is why state governments are stepping into the void left by cowardly organizations like the NCAA, enacting laws to protect women athletes from forced competition with males.

Beam
Beam
2 years ago

Travesty, pure & simple. Do we have to create a 3rd category for ‘trans’ male to female, or a 4th category ‘trans’ female to male. Oh God, what have we become?

9
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x