Login | Premium Info | My Cart |
advertisement
The World's Leading Independent Resource for Swimming
   --- Lane 9 News ---   


NCAA Elects to Rescind Moratorium on Swimsuits, ASCA, CSCAA Respond -- September 12, 2008

Updated September 12

INDIANAPOLIS, Indiana, September 11. CONTRARY to some of the discussions going around the swimming community this week, the NCAA has elected to reverse its high tech swimsuit ban voted on earlier this summer.

After another meeting of the swimming committee this week, the NCAA will now allow all suits approved by FINA for competition, but reserves the right to revisit the situation as more scientific information is found regarding the newer suits.


Currently, the NCAA states that "the committee [previously] discussed whether these suits provided an advantage for the swimmer that could be defined as illegal assistance...the committee recently determined that without any concrete evidence to the contrary, these new-technology suits will be deemed compliant for all intercollegiate competition."

Reading between the lines, there is still the chance that when the newer swimsuits undergo neutral, scientific testing to be defined as enhancing performance, that the NCAA could reinstate the moratorium.

Swimming World obtained an early look at the memo going out to NCAA members regarding the move. Here is a reprint of the complete memo:

TO: Directors of Athletics, Conference Commissioners and Head Men's and
Women's Swimming and Diving Coaches of NCAA Institutions that
Sponsor Swimming and Diving.

FROM: Tracy Huth, chair
NCAA Men's and Women's Swimming and Diving Committee

Sue Petersen Lubow, secretary-rules editor
NCAA Swimming and Diving Committee.

SUBJECT: New-Technology Swim Suits.


The NCAA Men's and Women's Swimming and Diving Committee has decided to allow all new-technology suits approved by FINA (the international governing body for swimming) to be worn in intercollegiate competition including NCAA championships. The committee did not allow the new suits to be worn for the 2008 championships this past March.

At its July annual meeting, the committee discussed whether these suits provided an advantage for the swimmer that could be defined as illegal assistance. At the time of the annual meeting, the committee did not have any scientific evidence on this matter. The committee recently determined that without any concrete evidence to the contrary, these new-technology suits will be deemed compliant for all intercollegiate competition.

The committee will continue to monitor and stay abreast of this topic and reserves the right to change or modify its determination on this matter, as warranted in its discretion by future developments. The committee also will seek to collaborate with FINA and USA swimming on this matter, as well as on other issues of importance to the swimming and diving community.

TH/SPL:kss

cc: Selected NCAA Staff Members


The American Swimming Coaches Association and the College Swimming Coaches Association of America have since responded to the NCAA's 180 turn on the issue.

ASCA Executive Director John Leonard
It is a typically conservative, scared-of-the-wind decision by a bunch of lawyers and completely the wrong decision for our sport. And it likely will cost us a couple more college programs who can't afford another $13-15,000 budget item. Disgraceful.

CSCAA Executive Director Phil Whitten
The NCAA's decision comes as no surprise given, for example, just the issue of policing who is wearing which suit at meets all around the world.

Still, at a minimum, we would like to have seen the NCAA address the cost issue. As things stand now, it is those schools with limited budgets - particularly in Divisions II and III -- that are most likely to be impacted by this decision.

We would like to see the major swim suit manufacturers -- Speedo, TYR, Nike, Aqua Zone, Diana and adidas, among others -- find ways to reduce prices significantly.

In the long run, the world swimming community must demand that FINA establish reasonable standards for "flotation" and "performance-enhancing" -- both of which are proscribed by FINA, as well as USA Swimming and the NCAA - and appoint and fund an independent testing company to test all new suits before they are permitted to be used in competition. Right now, FINA is the only governing body that does not have an independent testing and evaluation process in place,


Premium Members - Search More About: NCAA


Reaction Time Comments
Reaction Time responses do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions
of Swimming World Magazine or SwimmingWorldMagazine.com.

Reaction Time is provided as a service to our readers.

September 11, 2008 Cop out.
Submitted by: laurenish
September 11, 2008 How to Lose Men's College Teams 101: Bring back a rule that will not affect large already prominent programs with enough cash to buy these suits and then have smaller, more cash strapped teams with limited budgets see an even wider performance gap emerge when said school's athletic department says no to an almost $12,000 swim suit bill (for one suit per swimmer...no extras)and then re-examines if it needs men's swimming since their program "can not be competitive" against richer programs.
How to start losing women's College Teams 101: See Men's swimming 101 and replace "men" with "women".
Title IX will have very little to do with this.
Some of us were so impressed the NCAA held their ground about this....sad to see they caved in.
Submitted by: rcoach
September 16, 2008 Skip Foster's interview today (Sept. 16) proved what John Leonard said -- lawyers made this decision. Prepare for arguments not just at the NCAA level, but Masters, high school and age group.
Submitted by: Charlie
September 16, 2008 Has NFHS approved the Speedo LZR suit for high school swimming?
Submitted by: swimsmart
September 17, 2008 All reports had been that the NCAA was the only organization taking a step to deny these suits' use absent further testing. The only thing on the NFHS website about attire/uniforms the past several years seems to be about jewelry.

Checking the NCAA's 2008 rules (pp. 37-38, copied below), apparently the legal advice is that maintaining the integrity of the sport is not as important as the clause that says the NCAA rules committee "is not responsible for testing or approving playing
equipment for use in intercollegiate swimming."

From what I can tell, all we've seen the last decade is the swimsuit manufacturers pushing the boundaries of integrity as much as they can get away with. Teflon patterns on jammers have gradually given way to full-bodied, rubber coated tights. As mad as I want to get at some of the marketers (especially the ones with world class swimming experience), selling product is their jobs. It's FINA and other governing bodies that have to draw the line.

But now they've allowed swimming in balloons, so what's next? Some team swims with webbed gloves and says the NCAA/USMS/NFHS can't stop them because the governing bodies have given up their right to defend themselves due to this kind of rule interpretation? I'm only half kidding.


RULE 3 - Competitors
SECTION 1. General Uniforms

ARTICLE 1. a. Competitors' uniforms should be characterized by conformity to recognized standards of propriety.
b. In accordance with NCAA Bylaw 12.5.4, an institution's uniform or any item of apparel (e.g., bathing suits and warm-ups) that is worn by a student-athlete while representing the institution in intercollegiate competition shall contain only a single manufacturer's or distributor's logo or trademark on the outside of the apparel (regardless of the visibility of the logo or trademark). The logo or trademark must be contained within a four-sided geometrical figure (i.e., rectangle, square, parallelogram) that does not exceed 2¼-square inches. Such an item of apparel may contain more than one manufacturer's or distributor's logo or trademark on the inside of the apparel provided the logo or trademark is not visible.
c. If an institution's uniform or any item of apparel worn by a student-athlete in competition contains washing instructions on the outside of the apparel or on a patch that also includes the manufacturer's or distributor's logo or trademark, the entire patch must be contained within a four-sided geometrical figure (i.e., rectangle, square, parallelogram) that does not exceed 2¼-square inches.
d. The restriction of the size of a manufacturer's or distributor's logo is applicable to all apparel worn by student-athletes during the conduct of the institution's competition, which includes any pregame or postgame activities (e.g., postgame celebrations or pre- or postgame media conferences) involving student-athletes.

Artificial Aids
ARTICLE 2. No swimmer is permitted to wear or use any device or foreign substances to help his or her speed, pace or buoyancy in competition. Pulling on a lane line to assist motion is not permitted. Temporarily applied adhesives shall not be used to assist the backstroke start; however, host institutions are encouraged to have all end walls and touch pads finished with a permanent or semipermanent nonslip surface. Goggles may be worn and rubdown oil may be applied if not considered excessive by the referee.

New Equipment
ARTICLE 3. The NCAA Men's and Women's Swimming and Diving Committee is responsible for formulating the official playing rules for the sport. The committee is not responsible for testing or approving playing equipment for use in intercollegiate swimming.
Equipment manufacturers have undertaken the responsibility for the development of playing equipment that meets specifications established by the committee. The NCAA urges manufacturers to work with the various independent testing agencies to ensure the production of safe products. Neither the NCAA nor the NCAA Men's and Women's Swimming Committee certifies the safety of any swimming equipment. Only equipment that meets the specifications stated in the NCAA Men's and Women's Swimming and Diving Rules may be used in intercollegiate competition.
While the committee does not regulate the development of new equipment and does not set technical or scientific standards for testing equipment or the approval or disapproval of specific playing equipment, the committee may provide manufacturers with informal guidelines as to the equipment-performance levels it considers consistent with the integrity of the sport. The committee reserves the right to intercede in order to protect and maintain that integrity.
The NCAA Men's and Women's Swimming and Diving Committee suggests that manufacturers planning innovative changes in swimming equipment submit the equipment to the NCAA Men's and Women's Swimming and Diving Committee for review before production.
Submitted by: Charlie
September 17, 2008 I was talking to a Div. I college coach yesterday who was not very happy about this at all. They are not a top 10 program where all the Speedo+friends sponsored (and paid) coaches are and can afford this financial burden.
He has already basically been given the "NO" from his athletic department for increasing his suit budget to approx. $26,000.00 for swim suits (1 per swimmer and no extras--and offered they would use the suit for 2 years--which we all know is long past the suit life of these new models).
Heck, the whole team is not even all racing in "Pro's" now because of the cost.
Too bad the NCAA lost it's spine on this one. They really had a chance to take one step to repairing what I believe is a badly eroding image in the American swimming community.
Submitted by: rcoach
Reaction Time responses do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions
of Swimming World Magazine or SwimmingWorldMagazine.com.

Reaction Time is provided as a service to our readers.



Subscribe Now!
Subscribe to Swimming World Magazine
Purchase a 30 Day Premium Membership for only $4.95

Reaction Time Login
Submit Your Comments to This Story (Free)

Don't have a Reaction Time Account?
Click here
and setup your free account now!


Screen Name:
Password:

Submit Your Comments On This Story:
All comments will be reviewed by our Editors.
Forgot Screen Name or Password?
Click here
and we will email it to you.


Advertisement
Click Here for More Info

Advertisements
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
Swimming World Magazine Team Partnership Program




Sports Publications International