FINA and IOC Remove Last Vestige of Victorian Morality From the Olympic Swimming Program

1912 British Women Relay Team

Commentary by Bruce Wigo, CEO of International Swimming Hall of Fame.

From the Middle Ages to the dawn of the 20th century, women were discouraged from participating or even watching physical activity. This view was held because a woman was supposed to be passive, obedient and the “weaker sex.” In fact, it was often argued that sport was harmful to women.

Victorian morality, with its concerns about women exposing their skin and inciting uncontrollable lust in males, kept women covered in bathing costumes consisting of dark woolen or flannel stockings, bloomers, skirts and blouses that covered women from their necks to toes and to their wrists. While these costumes enabled women to bathe, they were impossible to swim in that apparel.

Because drowning became a major public safety issue at the turn of the twentieth century, swimming became the first physically active sport deemed acceptable for women. That’s because Edwardian society (after 1901) recognized that women had the right to know how to swim when a man wasn’t around to save them.

Through the efforts of the progressive Swedes, women’s swimming appeared on the program of the 1912 Olympic Games. But while the men swam distances of 100, 200, 400 and 1500 meters over seven events, there were only 2 events for women, the 100 freestyle and a 400 freestyle relay.

Women were also required to wear robes until immediately prior to the start of their races and to cover up immediately after leaving the water.

In 1920, a 300-meter event in Olympic Swimming was added to the women’s program along with a rule requiring women’s swim suits to have a skirt, which was also known as a modesty panel.

In 1924, the women’s 300 meter race was increased to 400 meters in Olympic swimming, but while the men swam an 800 freestyle relay, the women’s relay remained at 400 meters.

Prior to August 6, 1926, it was considered absolutely impossible for a woman to swim across the English Channel, even though five men had done it, starting with Matthew Webb in 1875.

On that date, American swimmer Gertrude Ederle, not only proved women were equal to men, but she actually beat the previous best time by NEARLY 2 HOURS! In an instant she became the most famous woman in the world and New York City gave her a reception that remains the largest ticker tape parade in the city’s history, with over two million people attending.

One consequence of Ederle’s accomplishment was that women’s track and field events were added to the 1928 Olympic program.

The Olympic swimming program of six men’s events and five women’s events remained untouched until 1956, when butterfly was added, but while men swam 200 meters, women were deemed capable of only swimming 100 meters.

In 1960, a men’s and women’s 400 medley relay was added. In 1964, the men’s and women’s 400 individual medley was added and the men’s 100 meter backstroke was changed to a 200 meter event, while the women’s event remained at 100 meters. In another change, the modestly opaque black or navy blue suit requirement was dropped to allow colored and patterned suits.

The 1960s saw dramatic changes that fostered the ideals of the gender equity movement in the Olympic Games. Women’s volleyball and basketball were added to the program. The most dramatic changes in swimming came in 1968. The program was gender equalized as men and women competed in both 100 and 200 meters in all individual stroke events, while both men and women competed in the same three relays.

However, even though Debbie Meyer was swimming the 1500 meters nearly 40 seconds faster than Australian male swimmer Murray Rose swam to win the Olympics in 1956, the IOC chose to add the 800 meter women’s distance event, rather than match the men’s 1500 meters.

Debbie Meyer Photo Courtesy: ISHOF – Olympic Swimming

In 1973, FINA dropped another vestige of Victorian thinking when it removed the requirement of the “modesty panel” from women’s suits.

The 2001 World Championships in Fukuoka, Japan, FINA added both distances of 800 and 1500 meters for both men and women, but the IOC did not extend the changes to the Olympics until now.

Finally in the upcoming 2020 Olympics, after over a 100 years of backward thinking, the last vestige of Victorian thinking has been abolished. Congratulations FINA and the IOC. You got it right!

Name*

Email*

Welcome to our community. We invite you to join our discussion. Our community guidelines are simple: be respectful and constructive, keep on topic, and support your fellow commenters. Commenting signifies that you agree to our Terms of Use

Name*

Email*

25 Comments

Oldest

Newest Most Voted

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

thezwimmer

6 years ago

I believe it was not until 1996 that the third women’s relay (4×200) was added.

Heather

6 years ago

Reply to thezwimmer

It said in 1968, men and women competed in the same 3 relays. I’m assuming those 3 haven’t changed and are the 4×200, 4×100 Frees and 4×100 Medley.

Tichler Krisztián

6 years ago

Women are still not racing in 50km walk, no greco roman wrestling and still less weight cathegories in boxing. These are the last hurdles left to full equality.

Walter Baer

6 years ago

Reply to Tichler Krisztián

how about rhytmic gymnastic and synchro swimming? ?

Nadine Brandl

6 years ago

Reply to Tichler Krisztián

Synchronized Swimming is right now trying to get the mixed duet to be Olympic.

Walter Baer

6 years ago

Reply to Tichler Krisztián

Nadine it’s been about equality

Nadine Brandl

6 years ago

Reply to Tichler Krisztián

Wouldn’t that be a step towards equality?
Yeah, the teams are still missing to be equal then, but as in the article, it also took some time in swimming to make it equal.

Marie Claire Richardson

6 years ago

We are still getting comments for our synchro swimmers in this day and age! Gail Elizabeth Hampson, Helen Costello, Leeds Synchro, Angélique Richardson, Susan Utting-Simon.

Gail Elizabeth Hampson

6 years ago

Reply to Marie Claire Richardson

Now it’s bum cheeks ..then it was..Nipples?

Tanya Irving Mccormick

6 years ago

OK then…you go get it Katie Ledecky!!!

Glen Osborne

6 years ago

This article says that the Olympics are just now in 2020 allowing the women’s 1500 free.
What was Katie Ladecky doing then???
I’m I wrong, or is this article flawed?

Patrik Portmann

6 years ago

Reply to Glen Osborne

Katie ledecky swam the 800 free at the Olympics, while competing in the 1500 free at world championships

Glen Osborne

6 years ago

Reply to Glen Osborne

Huh, I thought she did the 1500. Thanks for the clarification

Gabrielle Velez Rivera

6 years ago

Reply to Glen Osborne

Right ? I thought she swam it

Katie Bellock Richards

6 years ago

Carolyn Sexson Pattison Melissa Bangart Strouse Christine Koch Segneri Charlynn Darrah Jenny Courtney Sherry Brown
Rose Stockwell Esterly
Kim Hahn Krew

This would blow our girls minds. Look how they have thrived in this sport (mostly) without restriction in their young lives. Awesome…

Craig Stump

6 years ago

The next obstacle is to prevent men and boys who want to pretend they are women and girls from destroying everything that has been gained for real women in recent decades.

Jenis Frederick

6 years ago

Great article. I remember the modesty panels. Competition in drag suits.

Michael Stott

6 years ago

That it took FINA so long to take this step is patently pathetic. Yes, it is a reflection of mores and older (and even recent) times, but the delay to make the sport of swimming in the Olympics “gender equal”, as writer Bruce Wigo says, is a sad commentary on the membership and power structure within FINA in general. People with just a passing knowledge of the history of women’s distance swimming, especially Open Water swimming, have long recognized that the likes of Gertrude Erdele, Lynne Cox, Penny Dean, Diana Nyad and Katie Ledecky have demonstrated they are better swimmers than 95 percent of the men on the planet and that women are, and have been, more than capable of meeting the mental and physical challenges the sport requires.

Paul Lawson

6 years ago

Pauline Lawson

6 years ago

Reply to Paul Lawson

I desperately wanted white Jantzen racing bathers (yes they had a modesty skirt) but my dad refused to allow me (I got aqua) because of modesty reasons ?

Paul Lawson

6 years ago

Reply to Paul Lawson

Lol Pa was old school

Pauline Lawson

6 years ago

Reply to Paul Lawson

Very straight

Rich Davis

6 years ago

It’s still a rule that a woman’s suit must be a one piece suit. More I believe for modesty than speed. It may be a moot point with today’s technological suits that provide compression & stabilization of the core but in the Lycra era was it necessary or would a two piece suit have been faster?

SwimCoach Dad

6 years ago

The first world record listed for the women’s 1500 meters (LCM) was in 1922 according to my source. So, the IOC is just beating the century mark on that one. The men’s 800 meters (LCM) has had a world record kept since 1906. Proof that progress in the Olympics takes a very long time. The next question is, how long will they keep these events?

SwimCoach Dad

6 years ago

Since we’ve gotten a little into the evolution of the competitive swim suit, some of the women swimmers at the 1912 Stockholm Olympics wore swimming costumes made of silk because it was lighter probably. However, these suits when wet became see through so an undergarment was needed for some. So much for modesty. Like when the Belgrade Ribbolastic suits came out in 1973, particularly the orange, with no “modesty panel”. A lot of towels were quickly thrown on after a race wearing those suits. But it changed swimming forever.