{"id":639414,"date":"2026-03-22T11:29:56","date_gmt":"2026-03-22T18:29:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/?p=639414"},"modified":"2026-03-22T11:29:56","modified_gmt":"2026-03-22T18:29:56","slug":"the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018The Biggest Bummer:\u2019 NCAA\u2019s Experimental Cut of B Finals Met with Widespread Criticism"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u2018The Biggest Bummer:\u2019 NCAA\u2019s Experimental Cut of B Final Met with Widespread Criticism<\/strong><\/p>\n

Thursday night should\u2019ve been a celebration for Chloe Braun,<\/strong> but it ended up looking different than what she had expected.<\/p>\n

As a junior in 2025, Braun became the first swimmer from UC San Diego to qualify for the NCAA Women\u2019s Championships, in the first season of eligibility for a program elevating from Division II. She finished 20th in the 100 breaststroke, .13 away from a second swim.<\/p>\n

The goal for her senior season was clear. Get back to NCAAs, then get to the night session. The native of Toulouse, France, was within two tenths of her best time in prelims on Thursday. It was good for 16th place, the first NCAA point in Tritons history.<\/p>\n

The first night swim in program history, though, will have to wait. The removal of B finals at this year\u2019s edition of the championships deprived UC San Diego \u2013 the team qualified three swimmers this year after Braun alone last year \u2013 a moment to celebrate their progress under the NCAA state\u2019s brightest lights.<\/p>\n

That left Braun with \u201cvery mixed\u201d emotions.<\/p>\n

\u201cI get to score a point, so it\u2019s amazing,\u201d she said on deck Friday at Georgia Tech. \u201cBut at the same time, maybe we could have scored two, I don\u2019t know. It’s a bit sad. I can swim a bit faster in the morning, so I was thinking it was maybe going to be to my advantage. But who knows, maybe I would have been faster.<\/p>\n

\u201cSo it’s a bit sad. I would have loved to have a second swim, the fireworks, would have been awesome.\u201d<\/p>\n

Braun\u2019s is an extreme case. But all over NCAAs at the McAuley Aquatic Center, the women\u2019s field has nearly unanimously panned the new format. Aimed to streamline the night session and optimize it for TV digestion, it has led to diminished crowds and tempered energy at night \u2026 at least except until it comes time for chants of \u201cBring Back Bs\u201d through the gallery and for many swimmers to share their opinions on the format.<\/p>\n

Even more startling than the volume of condemnation is from whom it has come: Swimmers of such accomplishment that the difference between finishing eighth and ninth isn\u2019t a real risk. Bella Sims<\/strong> unloaded on it. Torri Huske<\/strong> offered a withering critique on Thursday, then came back Friday for an even more definitive and eloquent takedown drawing on personal experience.<\/p>\n

Those swimmers aren\u2019t at risk of losing anything save for a few extra minutes of rest before relays in a padded-out night session. But it\u2019s an acknowledgement of the community: The girls (and next week, guys) losing swims at NCAAs are those comrades in training groups that push A finalists to the speeds they\u2019re able to reach. The disappearance of B finals this week has brought that into sharp focus.<\/p>\n

From the top<\/h4>\n

Huske\u2019s criticism was multi-faceted. The six-time Olympic medalist on Thursday, after winning the 100 butterfly<\/a>, lamented not just the change but the lack of input from athletes such as herself, who might know a thing or two about how meets are run across the world.<\/p>\n

Three times, Huske emphasized how much the change \u201csucked.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cI like to focus on my own race, so I\u2019m usually pretty focused on the next step of my process,\u201d she said. \u201cI finished my 100 fly, I have to go change and warm down immediately. I\u2019m very focused on that part. But not having B finals is the biggest bummer.<\/p>\n

\u201cSeeing today, I knew it would suck beforehand, but seeing my teammates score points and they\u2019re 11th and 14th or whatever, it sucked not getting to watch them again. It sucked. I don\u2019t know why they did that. I\u2019m honestly still salty about it. You have to take those changes as they go, but I hope they bring them back next year.\u201d<\/p>\n

Huske entered the media area on Friday, after she won the 50 freestyle<\/a>, asking to be asked again about the B-final situation. She had more to say.<\/p>\n

\u201cMy freshman year, I B finaled in the 100 freestyle,\u201d Huske recounted. \u201cI messed up my start in prelims, and the rest of the race, I was freaking out, and I just didn’t execute my race plan. I didn’t follow it. Everything just kind of went to crap. I was freaking out. And I remember being so devastated by that swim. But I had another chance to prove myself and redeem myself at night, which is what I did. And I think it would have been so hurtful toward me mentally to not be able to get that chance again.\u201d<\/p>\n

Huske in 2022 was a disastrous 15th in prelims in the 100 free, going 48.12. She found redemption at night<\/a> by going 46.98, a time that would\u2019ve been fourth in the A final.<\/p>\n

\u201cI don’t really know whose input the CSCAA had when they were making that decision, but I have not talked to a single athlete or coach who has been happy with that decision,\u201d Huske continued. \u201cSo I hope that they feel pressured to bring it back next year, because at the end of the day, I think it’s just hurting athletes. I heard when I was in the ready room them chanting, \u2018Bring B Back.\u2019 And I just hope that they realize that they messed up and that they can own up to it and make that change again next year.\u201d<\/p>\n

The B final bounce<\/h4>\n

Huske isn\u2019t alone in that kind of experience, even on the Stanford roster. Lucy Bell<\/strong> on Friday swam to her second straight NCAA title in the 200 breaststroke<\/a>. It\u2019s the fifth time in her storied NCAA career that Bell finished in the top three in an event at NCAAs.<\/p>\n

Her first NCAAs swim? As a freshman in 2023, she started the meet by finishing 15th in the 200 individual medley. She credits that night swim with helping her summon the confidence a day later to make the A final in the 400 IM, where she finished seventh.<\/p>\n

\u201cI think that swim really helped me get my confidence that I could actually swim fast at a meet like this,\u201d Bell said. \u201cI think especially since the 4-IM was the next day, I think I wasn’t really expecting \u2026 a B final swim or any final swim at NCAAs. And so getting to swim that (in the 200 IM) and kind of get my feet in the water and get that high pressure feeling before maybe my better event was really crucial. I think that having the B finals is really important.<\/p>\n

\u201cJust in general, at ACCs, before the 4-IM, I saw the C final and I saw the B final and my best friends, they were killing it, and that got me so hyped and excited for my race. And I don’t know if I would have swam as well as I did at ACCs in the 4-IM if I hadn’t seen them and gotten as excited from that. As everyone knows, you need to step up in those high-pressure scenarios. And if you don’t have the opportunity to do that, it’s kind of difficult to do that once maybe once you get into the A final.\u201d<\/p>\n

Campbell Stoll<\/strong> was a freshman in 2024 who entered the 200 fly seeded 39th. She dropped more than a second to 1:54.74 in prelims to get into the B final, then another nine tenths at night to finish 12th in 1:53.83.<\/p>\n

Two years later, she went 1:50.26 on Saturday night to win the championship<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u201cI started crying because I was like, I can’t believe I did this,\u201d she said of her freshman experience. \u201cI finally made this final that I’d been dreaming about. \u2026 It gave me so much confidence. Just to get a second swim is huge. Coming into this meet as a freshman, you don’t really know a lot of things, and you’re coming in so inexperienced. You’ve been to high-level meets, but nothing compares to this meet. So having that B final really just gained so much confidence for myself, and definitely helped me get to where I am today.\u201d<\/p>\n

Back-filling the schedule<\/h4>\n

Reaction from swimmers have coalesced around both process and product. The College Swimming and Diving Coaches Association in May proposed the new meet schema<\/a> to \u201cmodernize\u201d the format. It said then that the goals were, \u201cto support collegiate swimming and diving by modernizing the championship format to better align with broadcast needs, while expanding institutional access through an updated qualification process.\u201d It\u2019s part of a suite of changes, both in qualification to this meet, event order and arrangement on days, and innovations like the CSCAA Dual Meet Challenge aimed at packaging swimming different.<\/p>\n

The aim for the finals sessions at NCAAs was concentrated action: Only A finals, shorter diving breaks, awards presentations at the end of the sessions. The objective was, \u201ca high-stakes, heavyweight experience \u2014 where every session matters and every race or dive has the power to shift the standings, elevating both the intensity and visibility of the championship and the sport.\u201d<\/p>\n

The result has been something less than those aspirations. The lack of actual swimming hasn\u2019t made sessions shorter. The need for swimmers to rest before relays has required buffer periods, which are no less time-consuming than B finals with less action.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s also the attendance effect: Thursday\u2019s session was more sparsely attended because many teams had no one in the session and thus no reason to head to the pool.<\/p>\n

\u201cEveryone leaves!,\u201d Michigan\u2019s Sims said Thursday, after her win in the 400 IM<\/a>. \u201cI\u2019m like, what are you doing, the meet is going on. All the teams leave and I\u2019m like, where is everyone? It\u2019s not as loud. I think that\u2019s another thing. Let\u2019s bring B finals back.\u201d<\/p>\n

Part of the appeal of no B finals, on paper, would be to occasion quicker, higher-stakes prelims. But any change in that area has been marginal at best.<\/p>\n

\u201cI was hearing some girls talk in the locker room and they were like, oh my god, this year\u2019s so much faster because everyone is going for top eight rather than top 16. And I\u2019m not really sure it\u2019s faster because of that,\u201d Sims said. \u201cI just think swimming gets faster and that\u2019s just how it is. I was talking about this with the coaches \u2013 every year, you get to NCAAs and are like, that\u2019s such a fast meet. But that happens every single year. I think swimming is getting faster, and that\u2019s how it should be.\u201d<\/p>\n

Swimmers aren\u2019t feeling it from a performance perspective. They are ready to adapt to whatever is thrown at them \u2013 \u201cThe schedule is what it is,\u201d Virginia\u2019s Claire Curzan<\/strong> said. Most are going to push hard in prelims anyway, and they\u2019ll do what they need to do to rest at night before relays, which many have said is pretty consistent with the past. The shuffle of the days of events is in that category \u2013 programs adapt as need be, and for everyone challenging new double created, one double pressure is relieved elsewhere.<\/p>\n

But the energy of the night session has been markedly different.<\/p>\n

\u201cI definitely wish I could have seen some of my teammates who got in the top 16 swim,\u201d Bell said. \u201cAnd I think it’s just a little bit, not anticlimactic, but it is like a little bit less hype to have that setup race. There\u2019s more teams, there\u2019s more people. Without that, yeah, having the A finals is great, but I think giving more people a chance to swim, I think would be really great to see.\u201d<\/p>\n

The fans in attendance Friday, which was a more robust crowd, mustered the \u201cBring Back B\u201d chant, which caught on quickly.<\/p>\n

\u201cI do think it\u2019s kind of a pulse check on everyone’s general feeling,\u201d Curzan said. \u201cI am really, really happy that people are paying attention to the sport and wanting to change it for the better, because I do think that swimming needs more exposure, and I think more eyes can definitely be on the sport. But I think maybe some more consultation with swimmers and coaches, now that we’ve figured out that this new format is maybe not ideal but could definitely still be built on, I think that would be awesome. And to give more people the opportunity to swim is obviously always better.\u201d<\/p>\n

Tales from what used to B<\/h4>\n

It\u2019s an exceedingly minor point compared to others, but Tatum Wall<\/strong> of Duke and Harriet Rogers<\/strong> of Arkansas both went 21.75 in the 50 free on Friday, tying for 16th. Without a physical B final to swim, they split a point each, instead of a session-capping swim-off. While that wouldn\u2019t have done much for the broadcast product, ask the attendees of U.S. Olympic Trials about the copious<\/a> thrilling swim-offs they were treated to there<\/a>.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s been a banner year for Pitt swimming. The Panthers\u2019 women\u2019s team recorded its highest-ever finish at ACCs, finishing sixth, with Claire Jansen,<\/strong> its first ACC women\u2019s medalist in a decade. The Panthers, as their recap of Day 3 of ACCs so succinctly put it, \u201cMatch 20 years of relay A-Cuts in one night.\u201d<\/p>\n

On Wednesday, the 800 freestyle relay of Avery Kudlac, Sydney Gring, Mary Clark<\/strong> and Jansen became the first Pitt relay to score at NCAAs in 39 years, finishing 12th. The 200 free relay was 16th. Gring was 16th in the 100 fly. Gring was 10th in the 200 IM, Jansen fourth in the 200 back on Saturday.<\/p>\n

The 2025 meet brought Pitt\u2019s highest NCAAs finish in 29 years, finishing 27th with 21 points. Pitt had more points than that by the end of Friday night, on the way to finishing 16th with 55 points.<\/p>\n

Friday had the potential to be a historic night to celebrate that. Jansen made the A final in the 100 back in 50.79 seconds in prelims. Gring finished 11th.<\/p>\n

All of which was great. But watching Gring swim in a B final before Jansen moved up to seventh in the A final would\u2019ve been unquestionably better.<\/p>\n

\u201cI knew this was a possibility. And I think I prepared myself early enough to know that this could happen,\u201d Gring said. \u201cIt does not feel great to not swim again, but I am still able to get points for the team, which automatically is just the goal anyway. There could be things different that I could have done, but I can’t think about that. I’m just glad I got points on the board.<\/p>\n

Jansen was 16th in the 100 back last year as a junior. It was an instrumental experience, she said, in vaulting to the A final this time.<\/p>\n

\u201cHaving that B final experience last year I think was really shaping in my career and kind of propelled me to this moment,\u201d Jansen said. \u201cI think B finals are a great thing, and I think it just builds the atmosphere. Watching Sydney before me swim would have been great.\u201d<\/p>\n

Saturday presented a potential strategic benefit of the lack of B finals. Both UCLA\u2019s Rosie Murphy<\/strong> and Virginia\u2019s Tess Howley<\/strong> set daunting doubles for themselves.<\/p>\n

Howley entered seeded second in the 200 fly and ninth in the 200 back, which are back-to-back. She finished third in prelims in fly to reach the A final (where she finished fourth for the third straight year) and then 10th in the 200 back. At night, chased points in the 200 fly unfettered by having to save anything in the tank for a B final in the 200 back, where her seven points for Virginia\u2019s title cause were sealed.<\/p>\n

Murphy made the A final in the 200 IM in seventh. She was 12th in the 200 back.<\/p>\n

When asked if the lack of B finals made it easier, the answer was clear.<\/p>\n

\u201cI would always, always be so happy and proud to have another swim, especially for UCLA, and just to be able to swim for my team again,\u201d she said. \u201cIt would mean a lot to me. But, it just makes me even more proud that I made an A final in the 2-IM. I would have loved to swim the 2-back again. I would have loved that challenge and to just have another chance to race for my team.\u201d<\/p>\n

And if the events were reversed, with the B final first before the A?<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is an interesting question,\u201d she said, \u201cbut I would still like the opportunity to swim it.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u2018The Biggest Bummer:\u2019 NCAA\u2019s Experimental Cut of B Final Met with Widespread Criticism Thursday night should\u2019ve been a celebration for Chloe Braun, but it ended up looking different than what<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8367,"featured_media":639135,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"dois","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[3,6],"tags":[126572,127728,137635,60521,131655,36117,102998,546,330,62205,327,131141,65067,366,74161,59590,543],"class_list":["post-639414","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-featured","category-college","tag-bella-sims","tag-campbell-stoll","tag-chloe-braun","tag-claire-curzan","tag-claire-jansen","tag-cscaa","tag-lucy-bell","tag-michigan","tag-ncaa-championships","tag-pitt","tag-stanford","tag-sydney-gring","tag-tess-howley","tag-texas","tag-torri-huske","tag-uc-san-diego","tag-virginia"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"\r\nNCAA\u2019s Experimental Cut of B Finals Met with Major Criticism<\/title>\r\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The decision to eliminate B Finals from the evening session at the NCAA Championships has been met with widespread criticism.\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\r\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018The Biggest Bummer:\u2019 NCAA\u2019s Experimental Cut of B Finals Met with Widespread Criticism\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The decision to eliminate B Finals from the evening session at the NCAA Championships has been met with widespread criticism.\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Swimming World\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/SwimmingWorld\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-03-22T18:29:56+00:00\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/venue-2026-Womens-NCAA-SD-0781-Edit-scaled.jpg\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1920\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Matthew De George - Senior Writer\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@sportsdoctormd\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@swimmingworld\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Matthew De George - Senior Writer\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\r\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Matthew De George - Senior Writer\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/aff20a2913cc03a514d0343a4c8788f3\"},\"headline\":\"\u2018The Biggest Bummer:\u2019 NCAA\u2019s Experimental Cut of B Finals Met with Widespread Criticism\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-22T18:29:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-22T18:29:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/\"},\"wordCount\":2788,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/venue-2026-Womens-NCAA-SD-0781-Edit-scaled.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Bella Sims\",\"Campbell Stoll\",\"Chloe Braun\",\"Claire Curzan\",\"Claire Jansen\",\"CSCAA\",\"Lucy Bell\",\"Michigan\",\"NCAA Championships\",\"Pitt\",\"Stanford\",\"Sydney Gring\",\"Tess Howley\",\"Texas\",\"Torri Huske\",\"UC-San Diego\",\"Virginia\"],\"articleSection\":[\"-Home Slider\",\"College\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/\",\"name\":\"NCAA\u2019s Experimental Cut of B Finals Met with Major Criticism\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/venue-2026-Womens-NCAA-SD-0781-Edit-scaled.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-22T18:29:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-22T18:29:56+00:00\",\"description\":\"The decision to eliminate B Finals from the evening session at the NCAA Championships has been met with widespread criticism.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/venue-2026-Womens-NCAA-SD-0781-Edit-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/venue-2026-Womens-NCAA-SD-0781-Edit-scaled.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1920,\"caption\":\"Photo Courtesy: Peter H. Bick\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018The Biggest Bummer:\u2019 NCAA\u2019s Experimental Cut of B Finals Met with Widespread Criticism\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Swimming World\",\"description\":\"The Global Leader in Aquatic News\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Swimming World\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SWorld_BLKBKG-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SWorld_BLKBKG-1.jpg\",\"width\":1799,\"height\":900,\"caption\":\"Swimming World\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/SwimmingWorld\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/swimmingworld\",\"https:\/\/instagram.com\/swimmingworldmag\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/SwimmingWorldSPI\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/aff20a2913cc03a514d0343a4c8788f3\",\"name\":\"Matthew De George - Senior Writer\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7cfca9cef277cfa1a9f4150330ba69a2?s=96&d=blank&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7cfca9cef277cfa1a9f4150330ba69a2?s=96&d=blank&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"Matthew De George - Senior Writer\"},\"description\":\"Matthew De George is the Americas Correspondent for Swimming World Magazine. He's the author of two books on swimming, Duels in the Pool and Pooling Talent. He's also the assistant sports editor for the Delaware County Daily Times in Pennsylvania, where he covers high school and college sports as well as the Philadelphia Union. His work has also appeared in The Guardian and The Athletic.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.swimmingworld.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/sportsdoctormd\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/author\/mattdg\/\"}]}<\/script>\r\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NCAA\u2019s Experimental Cut of B Finals Met with Major Criticism","description":"The decision to eliminate B Finals from the evening session at the NCAA Championships has been met with widespread criticism.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018The Biggest Bummer:\u2019 NCAA\u2019s Experimental Cut of B Finals Met with Widespread Criticism","og_description":"The decision to eliminate B Finals from the evening session at the NCAA Championships has been met with widespread criticism.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/","og_site_name":"Swimming World","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/SwimmingWorld","article_published_time":"2026-03-22T18:29:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":1920,"url":"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/venue-2026-Womens-NCAA-SD-0781-Edit-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Matthew De George - Senior Writer","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@sportsdoctormd","twitter_site":"@swimmingworld","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Matthew De George - Senior Writer","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/"},"author":{"name":"Matthew De George - Senior Writer","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/aff20a2913cc03a514d0343a4c8788f3"},"headline":"\u2018The Biggest Bummer:\u2019 NCAA\u2019s Experimental Cut of B Finals Met with Widespread Criticism","datePublished":"2026-03-22T18:29:56+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-22T18:29:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/"},"wordCount":2788,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/venue-2026-Womens-NCAA-SD-0781-Edit-scaled.jpg","keywords":["Bella Sims","Campbell Stoll","Chloe Braun","Claire Curzan","Claire Jansen","CSCAA","Lucy Bell","Michigan","NCAA Championships","Pitt","Stanford","Sydney Gring","Tess Howley","Texas","Torri Huske","UC-San Diego","Virginia"],"articleSection":["-Home Slider","College"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/","url":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/","name":"NCAA\u2019s Experimental Cut of B Finals Met with Major Criticism","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/venue-2026-Womens-NCAA-SD-0781-Edit-scaled.jpg","datePublished":"2026-03-22T18:29:56+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-22T18:29:56+00:00","description":"The decision to eliminate B Finals from the evening session at the NCAA Championships has been met with widespread criticism.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/venue-2026-Womens-NCAA-SD-0781-Edit-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/venue-2026-Womens-NCAA-SD-0781-Edit-scaled.jpg","width":2560,"height":1920,"caption":"Photo Courtesy: Peter H. Bick"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/the-biggest-bummer-ncaas-experimental-cut-of-b-finals-met-with-widespread-criticism\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018The Biggest Bummer:\u2019 NCAA\u2019s Experimental Cut of B Finals Met with Widespread Criticism"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/","name":"Swimming World","description":"The Global Leader in Aquatic News","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#organization","name":"Swimming World","url":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SWorld_BLKBKG-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SWorld_BLKBKG-1.jpg","width":1799,"height":900,"caption":"Swimming World"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/SwimmingWorld","https:\/\/x.com\/swimmingworld","https:\/\/instagram.com\/swimmingworldmag\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/SwimmingWorldSPI"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/aff20a2913cc03a514d0343a4c8788f3","name":"Matthew De George - Senior Writer","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7cfca9cef277cfa1a9f4150330ba69a2?s=96&d=blank&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7cfca9cef277cfa1a9f4150330ba69a2?s=96&d=blank&r=pg","caption":"Matthew De George - Senior Writer"},"description":"Matthew De George is the Americas Correspondent for Swimming World Magazine. He's the author of two books on swimming, Duels in the Pool and Pooling Talent. He's also the assistant sports editor for the Delaware County Daily Times in Pennsylvania, where he covers high school and college sports as well as the Philadelphia Union. His work has also appeared in The Guardian and The Athletic.","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.swimmingworld.com","https:\/\/x.com\/sportsdoctormd"],"url":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/author\/mattdg\/"}]}},"cc_featured_image_caption":{"caption_text":"Photo Courtesy: Peter H. Bick","source_text":"","source_url":""},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/venue-2026-Womens-NCAA-SD-0781-Edit-scaled.jpg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p56Jja-2Gl8","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/639414","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8367"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=639414"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/639414\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":639664,"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/639414\/revisions\/639664"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/639135"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=639414"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=639414"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=639414"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}