{"id":49929,"date":"2014-02-17T17:44:12","date_gmt":"2014-02-18T00:44:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/news.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/?p=49929"},"modified":"2014-02-17T17:45:18","modified_gmt":"2014-02-18T00:45:18","slug":"stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/","title":{"rendered":"Stanford Knocks California Off Top Spot In Final CSCAA Women’s Division I Poll"},"content":{"rendered":"

PHOENIX, Arizona, February 17. IT took an entire dual-meet season to do it, but the California Golden Bears women\u2019s team was just knocked off the top spot in the College Swim Coaches Association of America\u2019s poll of the top 25 Division I women\u2019s swimming and diving teams. And it was chief rival Stanford that knocked Cal off the perch they\u2019d enjoyed since last October. <\/p>\n

The goal of the CSCAA rankings committee is to produce an in-season poll of the 25 best-performing teams in rank order at the time of each poll. The poll is not designed to predict the results of the NCAA Championship, but rather which teams would win head-to-head against other teams in the country. <\/p>\n

Specifically, the poll committee does not differentiate between the types of meets, or the status of a specific team in terms of rested versus unrested, when considering votes. Further, rankings are only based on performances that have taken place up to that point in the season, with an emphasis on action from the previous poll. <\/p>\n

Swimming World<\/i> has been invited as a media member to participate in the polling process, and has a vote in each poll. Jeff Commings serves as Swimming World’s representative on these weekly conference calls. Also participating in the poll:<\/p>\n

Chair: Matt Barany, University of Richmond; Arthur Albiero, University of Louisville; Dan Colella, Duke University; Roric Fink, University of Texas; Naya Higashijima, UCLA; Kristin Hill, Boise State University; Sue Novitsky, University of Illinois; Brian Smith, University of Georgia; Suzanne Yee, Princeton University<\/p>\n

1. Stanford (10-0, 7-0 Pac 12)
\nPrevious rank: 4<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nW vs. San Jose State (9\/26), 138-100
\nW vs. Washington State (10\/3), 147-104
\nW at Oregon State (10-25), 170-88
\nW vs. Wisconsin (11\/2), 201-85
\nArt Adamson Invitational (11\/21-23)
\nW at Texas (1\/4), 154-146
\nW vs. Arizona (1\/24), 157-138
\nW vs. Arizona State (1\/25), 148-68<\/p>\n

Since last poll:<\/i>
\nW at UCLA (1-31), 180-120
\nW at Southern California (2\/1), 170-130
\nW vs. California (2\/15), 167-133<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> Pac 12 swimming and diving championships (2\/26-3\/1)<\/p>\n

The Cardinal achieved a perfect season, thanks to strong wins over Southern Cal and rival California.<\/p>\n

2. Southern California (7-1, 6-1 Pac 12)
\nPrevious rank: 5<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nW at Washington State (10\/18), 146-116
\nSMU Classic (10\/18-19), first place
\nW at Arizona State (11\/8), 167-128
\nW at Arizona (11\/9), 167-133
\nTexas Invitational (12\/5-7)
\nW vs. Utah (1\/10), 119-91
\nW vs. Wisconsin (1\/11), 154-103<\/p>\n

Since last poll:<\/i>
\nW vs. California (1\/31), 180.5-119.5
\nL vs. Stanford (2\/1), 170-130
\nW at UCLA (2\/17), 165-135<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> Pac 12 swimming and diving championships (2\/26-3\/1)<\/p>\n

The Trojans finished the dual-meet season strong, putting up strong times to help them beat Cal in January.<\/p>\n

3. Georgia (10-0-1, 5-0-1 SEC)
\nPrevious rank: 2<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nW vs. Kentucky (9\/25), 165-98
\nW vs. Wisconsin (10\/4-5), 182-136
\nW vs. Georgia Tech (10\/15), 187-88
\nW at LSU (10\/18), 170.5-118.5
\nW at Florida (11\/7), 162-138
\nW vs. Emory (11\/15), 137-73
\nAuburn Invitational (11\/22-24)
\nW vs North Carolina State (1\/4), 186-113
\nTie at Texas A&M (1\/10), 150-150
\nW at Texas (1\/11), 157.5-142.5
\nW vs. Tennessee (1\/25), 177.5-114.5<\/p>\n

Since last poll:<\/i>
\nW vs. Alabama (2\/1), 181-102<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> Pac 12 swimming and diving championships (2\/26-3\/1)<\/p>\n

A shift in the top two teams in this final poll caused Georgia to slip a bit in the rankings, but the Bulldogs stay in the top three as they prepare to defend their national title.<\/p>\n

4. Texas A&M (8-0-1, 3-0-1 SEC)
\nPrevious rank: 3<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nW at Vanderbilt (10\/12), 154.5-98.5
\nW vs. Texas (10\/18), 152-148
\nW at Missouri (11\/1), 159-118
\nArt Adamson Invitational (11\/21-23)
\nW vs. Rice (12\/20), 158-96
\nTie vs. Georgia (1\/10), 150-150
\nW vs. SMU (1\/11), 174-110
\nW vs. Houston (1\/16), 159-125
\nW at Louisiana State (1\/18), 168-127<\/p>\n

Since last poll:<\/i>
\nW vs. North Texas (2\/1), 153-97<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> Southeastern Conference championships (Tuesday through Saturday)<\/p>\n

Racing against a weaker team didn\u2019t help the Aggies stay in the top three in the CSCAA poll, but they remain in the top five, as they have all season.<\/p>\n

5. California (7-2, 5-2 Pac 12)
\nPrevious rank: 1<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nW at Oregon State (9\/27), 161-95
\nW vs. Washington State (10\/4), 164-89
\nW vs. Florida (10\/19-20), 238-210
\nW vs. Wisconsin (11\/1), 163-111
\nUNLV Fall Invitational (11\/21-23)
\nUSA Swimming nationals (12\/5-7)
\nW vs. Arizona State (1\/24), 229-69
\nW vs. Arizona (1\/25), 190-109<\/p>\n

Since last poll:<\/i>
\nL at Southern California (1\/31), 190.5-119.5
\nW at UCLA (2\/1), 183.5-116.5
\nL at Stanford (2\/15), 167-133<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> Pac 12 swimming and diving championships (2\/26-3\/1)<\/p>\n

Two losses on the road to end the season severely hurt Cal\u2019s chances of keeping the No. 1 spot, but the reigning NCAA runners-up now look toward the postseason.<\/p>\n

6. Texas (9-3, 1-0 Big 12)
\nPrevious rank: 6<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nW vs. Rice (10\/11), 149-99
\nW vs. North Carolina (10\/17), 171-129
\nL at Texas A&M (10\/18), 152-148
\nW at Indiana (10\/25) 155-141
\nW vs. Michigan (at Indiana) (10\/25), 210-90
\nW at Virginia (11\/8-9), 196-157
\nW vs. Penn State (at Virginia) (11\/8-9), 242-111
\nW vs. West Virginia (at Virginia) (11\/8-9), 297-41
\nTexas Invitational (12\/5-7)
\nL vs. Stanford (1\/4), 154-146
\nW vs. Auburn (1\/9), 168.5-129.5
\nL vs. Georgia (1\/11), 157.5-142.5<\/p>\n

Since last poll:<\/i>
\nW at Arizona (1\/31-2\/1), 196-157<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> Big 12 championships (2\/26-3\/1)<\/p>\n

Beating Arizona was a big coup for Texas in terms of dual meet victories, and but it wasn\u2019t enough to get the Longhorns into that esteemed top five.<\/p>\n

7. Virginia (11-1, 4-0 ACC)
\nPrevious rank: 7<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nW at Navy (10\/25), 250-50
\nW vs. Yale (at Navy) (10\/25), 237-63
\nL vs. Texas (11\/8-9), 196-157
\nW vs. Penn State (11\/8-9), 226-127
\nW vs. West Virginia (11\/8-9), 288-50
\nBuckeye Invitational (11\/22-24)
\nW at Virginia Tech (1\/18), 245-125
\nW vs. Miami (at Virginia Tech) (1\/18), 266-93
\nW vs. Wisconsin (at Virginia Tech) (1\/18), 225-139
\nW at Duke (1\/24), 187.5-98.5
\nW at North Carolina (1\/25), 152-146<\/p>\n

Since last poll:<\/i>
\nW at North Carolina State (2\/1), 178.5-115.5
\nW vs. Pittsburgh (2\/8), 189-103<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> Atlantic Coast Conference championships (Wednesday through Saturday)<\/p>\n

Virginia holds their spot after beating two teams to close out the dual-meet season, led by a school record in the 1000 free by Leah Smith.<\/p>\n

8. Tennessee (8-0, 3-0 SEC)
\nPrevious rank: 12<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nW at UNC-Wilmington (9\/27), 178-116
\nW vs. South Carolina (10\/18), 169-124
\nW at Louisville (10\/24), 170-130
\nW at Indiana (11\/1), 171-123
\nW vs. Kentucky (at Indiana) (11\/1), 214-84
\nGeorgia Tech Invitational (11\/22-24)
\nUSA Swimming nationals (12\/5-7)
\nW vs. Virginia Tech (1\/11), 192-108
\nW vs. Missouri (1\/11), 192.5-106.5
\nL at Georgia (1\/25), 177.5-114.5<\/p>\n

Since last poll:<\/i>
\nW at Florida (2\/1), 152-148<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> Southeastern Conference championships (Tuesday through Saturday)<\/p>\n

Beating Florida in the Swamp helped the Volunteers make a big push up the rankings, solidly into the top 10.<\/p>\n

9. Florida (5-3, 3-2 SEC)
\nPrevious rank: 8<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nAll-Florida Invite (9\/27-29), first place
\nW at Missouri (10\/17), 181-109
\nL at California (10\/19-20), 238-210
\nL vs. Georgia (11\/1), 162-138
\nW vs. Alabama (11\/7), 179-113
\nBuckeye Invitational (11\/22-24)
\nW vs. Florida State (1\/4), 153-147
\nW vs. Florida Atlantic (1\/18), 175-112
\nW vs. Auburn (1\/25), 173.5-124.5<\/p>\n

Since last poll:<\/i>
\nL vs. Tennessee (2\/1), 152-148<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> Southeastern Conference championships (Tuesday through Saturday)<\/p>\n

Losing to a conference rival caused the Gators to slip a bit, but will head into the postseason with a top 10 ranking.<\/p>\n

10. North Carolina (9-2, 3-1 ACC)
\nPrevious rank: 9<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nW at Virginia Tech (10\/11), 233-120
\nW vs. Radford (at Virginia Tech) (10\/11), 289-55
\nW vs. Liberty (at Virginia Tech) (10\/11), 262-87
\nW vs. James Madison (at Virginia Tech) (10\/11), 272.5-80.5
\nL at Texas (10\/17), 171-129
\nW at TCU (10\/18), 200-97
\nSMU Classic (10\/18-19), third place
\nW vs Louisville (11\/1-2), 213-140
\nDowd Nike Cup (11\/21-23)
\nW vs. Navy (1\/11), 194-97
\nL vs. Virginia (1\/25), 152-146<\/p>\n

Since last poll:<\/i>
\nW vs. North Carolina State (1\/31), 167.5-126.5
\nW at Duke (2\/1), 157-134<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> Friday vs. North Carolina State<\/p>\n

Winning dual meets against two conference teams kept the Tar Heels in the top 10, and gave them a winning dual-meet conference record.<\/p>\n

11. Arizona (7-1, 3-1 Pac 12)
\nPrevious rank: 10<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nW at Utah (10\/19), 204-96
\nW vs. UNLV (10\/25), 183-109
\nW vs. UCLA (11\/8), 151-149
\nL vs. USC (11\/9), 167-133
\nW vs. Boise State (11\/23) 172-106
\nTexas Invitational (12\/5-7)
\nW vs. Oregon State (1\/3), 195-91
\nW vs. New Mexico State (1\/3), 202-92
\nW vs. Northern Arizona (1\/3), 188-107
\nL at Stanford (1\/24), 158-137
\nL at California (1\/25), 190-109<\/p>\n

Since last poll:<\/i>
\nL vs. Texas (1\/31-2\/1), 196-157
\nW at Arizona State (2\/8), 196-157<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> Pac 12 championships (2\/26-3\/1)<\/p>\n

The Wildcats have been teetering in and out of the top 10, and end the dual-meet season just outside of it after a big loss to Texas.<\/p>\n

12. Minnesota (9-0, 5-0 Big Ten)
\nPrevious rank: 13 (tie)<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nW vs. Arizona State (10\/5), 197-94
\nW vs. Michigan (10\/11), 174.5-125.5
\nW at Wisconsin (10\/18-19), 218-152
\nW at Iowa (11\/1), 194-101
\nW at North Dakota (11\/9), 179-114
\nMinneapolis Grand Prix (11\/14-16)
\nJean Freeman Invite (12\/5-7)
\nW at Hawaii (1\/11), 164-95
\nW vs. North Carolina State (1\/24-25), 190.5-156.5<\/p>\n

Since last poll:<\/i>
\nW vs. Purdue (1\/31-2\/1), 226-127
\nW vs. Wisconsin (1\/31-2\/1), 202-149<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> Big 10 championships (Wednesday through Saturday)<\/p>\n

Minnesota completes a perfect dual meet season with two victories over conference rivals in a two-day racing format.<\/p>\n

13. Indiana (8-3, 5-0 Big Ten)
\nPrevious rank: 11<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nDennis Stark Relays (10\/11), third place
\nW at Notre Dame (10\/12), 155-145
\nL vs. Auburn (at Notre Dame) (10\/12), 180-120
\nSMU Classic (10\/18-19), second place
\nW vs. Michigan (10\/25), 181-119
\nL vs. Texas (10\/25), 158.5-141.5
\nL vs. Tennessee (11\/1), 171-123
\nW vs. Kentucky (11\/1), 199-95
\nUSA Swimming nationals (12\/5-7)
\nW vs. Iowa (1\/18), 170-126
\nW vs. Missouri (at Iowa) (1\/18), 170-121
\nW vs. Illinois (at Iowa) (1\/18), 193-103
\nW vs. Purdue (1\/25), 154.5-134.5<\/p>\n

Since last poll:<\/i>
\nW vs. Louisville (1\/31), 175-123<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> Big 10 championships (Wednesday through Saturday)<\/p>\n

Indiana put some impressive times against Louisville, but wasn\u2019t enough to hold their 11th-place spot.<\/p>\n

14. Louisville (6-3, 2-0 American)
\nPrevious rank: 13 (tie)<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nW vs. Xavier (10\/11), 189-70
\nSMU Classic (10\/18-19), third place
\nL vs. Tennessee (10\/24), 170-130
\nL at North Carolina (11\/1), 213-140
\nMichigan Invitational (11\/22-24)
\nUSA Swimming nationals (12\/5-7)
\nW vs. Georgia Tech (1\/4), 202-60
\nW vs. Cincinnati (1\/11), 211-84
\nW vs. Houston (1\/11), 210-85
\nW vs. Notre Dame (1\/18), 171-129
\nW vs. Kentucky (1\/25), 193-107<\/p>\n

Since last poll:<\/i>
\nL at Indiana (1\/31), 175-123<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> American Athletic Conference championships (Wednesday through Saturday)<\/p>\n

The Cardinals\u2019 top-end talent wasn\u2019t enough to beat Indiana\u2019s depth.<\/p>\n

15. Ohio State (9-1, 3-0 Big Ten)
\nPrevious rank: 16<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nW at Kentucky (10\/11), 195-104
\nW vs. Kenyon (10\/25), 191-99
\nW vs. Cleveland State (11\/1), 252-48
\nW vs. Denison (11\/1), 251.5-48.5
\nW vs. Virginia Tech (11\/1), 191-109
\nL at Purdue (11\/8), 157-143
\nW vs. Northwestern (11\/8), 211-89
\nW vs. Ohio (11\/9), 193-106
\nBuckeye Invitational (11\/22-24)
\nW at Toledo (1\/11), 206.5-93.5
\nKenyon Winter Invite (1\/24-25)<\/p>\n

Since last poll:<\/i>
\nW vs. Michigan (1\/31-2\/1), 181-172<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> Big 10 championships (Wednesday through Saturday)<\/p>\n

Beating conference rival Michigan got the Buckeyes into the top 15.<\/p>\n

16. UCLA (10-1, 4-4 Pac 12)
\nPrevious rank: 17<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nW at San Diego (10\/19), 184.5-101.5
\nW vs. Santa Barbara (11\/1), 198-99
\nW vs. Oregon State (11\/1), 179-77
\nW vs. Florida Gulf Coast (11\/1), 201-98
\nL at Arizona (11\/8), 151-149
\nW at Arizona State (11\/9), 183-113
\nUNLV Fall Invitational (11\/21-23)
\nTexas Invitational (12\/5-7)
\nW vs. Utah (1\/11), 157-134
\nW at Washington State (1\/17-18), 275-147<\/p>\n

Since last poll:<\/i>
\nL vs. Stanford (1\/31), 180-120
\nL vs. California (2\/1), 183.5-116.5
\nL vs. Southern California (2\/17) 165-135<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> Pac 12 championships (2\/26-3\/1)<\/p>\n

Losing their final three home meets to strong teams didn\u2019t seem to hurt UCLA in the polls, as the Bruins move up one spot.<\/p>\n

17. Michigan (6-5, 3-4 Big Ten)
\nPrevious rank: 20<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nW vs. Iowa (9\/27), 185-111
\nL at Minnesota (10\/11), 174.5-125.5
\nL at Indiana (10\/25), 181-119
\nL vs. Texas (at Indiana) (10\/25), 210-90
\nW at Toledo (11\/1), 221-79
\nMichigan Open (11\/22-24)
\nUSA Swimming nationals (12\/5-7)
\nOrange Bowl Classic (1\/3)
\nL at Purdue (1\/10), 164.5-135.5
\nW at Northwestern (1\/11), 172-128
\nW vs. Notre Dame (at Northwestern) (1\/11), 168-132
\nW vs. Rutgers (at Northwestern) (1\/11), 219-81<\/p>\n

Since last poll:<\/i>
\nL at Ohio State (1\/31-2\/1), 181-172
\nW at Michigan State (2\/7), 164-107<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> Big 10 championships (Wednesday through Saturday)<\/p>\n

The Wolverines fought hard against Ohio State and handily beat their in-state rival to finish the season.<\/p>\n

18. Auburn (4-1, 2-1 SEC)
\nPrevious rank: 15<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nW at Vanderbilt (9\/27), 158-44
\nDennis Stark Relays (10\/11), first place
\nW at Notre Dame (10\/12), 180-120
\nW vs. Indiana (at Notre Dame) (10\/12), 180-120
\nRoyals Invite (10\/25), unscored
\nAuburn Invitational (11\/22-24)
\nL at Texas (1\/9), 168.5-129.5
\nL at Florida (1\/25), 173.5-124.5<\/p>\n

Since last poll:<\/i>
\nW vs. South Carolina (2\/1), 177-118<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> Southeastern Conference championships (Tuesday through Saturday)<\/p>\n

A win against South Carolina apparently did not make a case for Auburn to stay in the top 15.<\/p>\n

19. Wisconsin (6-8, 2-2 Big Ten)
\nPrevious rank: 25<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nL at Georgia (10\/4-5), 361-275
\nL vs. Minnesota (10\/18-19), 438-302
\nL at California (11\/1), 163-111
\nL at Stanford (11\/2), 201-85
\nW at Northwestern (11\/15), 162-136
\nL at Notre Dame (11\/16), 171-126
\nTexas Invitational (12\/5-7)
\nL at Southern California (1\/11), 154-103
\nW at Virginia Tech (1\/17-18), 203-164
\nL at Virginia (at Virginia Tech) (1\/17-18), 225-139
\nW at Miami (at Virginia Tech), (1\/17-18), 252-101<\/p>\n

Since last poll:<\/i>
\nW at Purdue (1\/31-2\/1), 183-168
\nL vs. Minnesota (1\/31-2\/1), 202-149
\nW at Milwaukee (2\/7), 139-93
\nW at Green Bay (2\/8), 140-94<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> Big 10 championships (Wednesday through Saturday)<\/p>\n

Wisconsin makes a big leap into the top 20 after ending their season with three dual-meet wins.<\/p>\n

20. Notre Dame (8-4, 1-0 ACC)
\nPrevious rank: 24<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nDennis Stark Relays (10\/11)
\nL vs. Auburn (10\/12), 180-120
\nL. vs. Indiana (10\/12), 155-145
\nL at Purdue (11\/1), 155.5-144.5
\nW at Pittsburgh (11\/9), 193-107
\nW vs. Virginia Tech (at Pittsburgh) (11\/9), 162-138
\nW vs. Valparaiso (11\/15), 219-60
\nW vs. Wisconsin (11\/15), 171-126
\nHawkeye Invitational (12\/6-8)
\nL vs. Michigan (at Northwestern) (1\/11), 168-132
\nW vs. Northwestern (1\/11), 160-140
\nW vs. Rutgers (1\/11), 206-94
\nL at Louisville (1\/18), 171-129<\/p>\n

Since last poll:<\/i>
\nW vs. Iowa (1\/31-2\/1), 263-106
\nW vs. Cleveland State (2\/8), 162-124<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> Atlantic Coast Conference championships (Wednesday through Saturday)<\/p>\n

Notre Dame also found its way into the top 20 with two impressive meet wins, led by versatile junior Emma Reaney.<\/p>\n

21. Purdue (7-0, 4-0 Big Ten)
\nPrevious rank: 18<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nW at Miami (Ohio) (10\/18), 177-116
\nIndiana Intercollegiates (10\/26), first place
\nW vs. Notre Dame (11\/1), 155.5-144.5
\nW vs. Northwestern (11\/8), 202-97
\nW vs. Ohio State (11\/8), 157-143
\nBuckeye Invitational (11\/22-24)
\nW at Hawaii (1\/4), 146-91
\nW vs. Michigan (1\/10), 164.5-135.5
\nW vs. Michigan State (1\/11), 167-125
\nL at Indiana (1\/25), 154.5-134.5<\/p>\n

Since last poll:<\/i>
\nL vs. Wisconsin (1\/31-2\/1), 183-168
\nL vs. Minnesota (1\/31-2\/1), 226-127<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> Big 10 championships (Wednesday through Saturday)<\/p>\n

Two losses against conference teams bumped Purdue out of the top 20.<\/p>\n

22. North Carolina State (6-5, 4-3 ACC)
\nPrevious rank: 21<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nAll North Carolina Invite (10\/4-5)
\nW at Virginia Tech (10\/19), 171-129
\nL at Florida State (10\/25), 157-143
\nW vs. Georgia State (at Florida State) (10\/25), 239-61
\nW vs. Duke (11\/8), 168-121
\nW vs. Miami (11\/8), 207-77
\nW vs. UNC-Wilmington (11\/9), 166-112
\nDowd Nike Cup (11\/21-23)
\nL at Georgia (1\/4), 186-113
\nW vs. Villanova (1\/10), 175-104
\nL at Minnesota (1\/24-25), 190-156<\/p>\n

Since last poll:<\/i>
\nL vs. North Carolina (1\/31), 167.5-126.5
\nL vs. Virginia (2\/1), 178.5-115.5<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> Atlantic Coast Conference championships (Wednesday through Saturday)<\/p>\n

The Wolfpack couldn\u2019t get past in-state rival UNC or conference foe Virginia to finish the dual-meet season.<\/p>\n

23. Penn State (5-2, 0-0 Big Ten)
\nPrevious rank: 19<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nW vs. West Virginia (10\/18), 152-102
\nL at Virginia (11\/8-9), 226-127
\nL vs. Texas (at Virginia) (11\/8-9), 242-111
\nTexas Invitational (12\/5-7)
\nUnscored meet vs. North Carolina (in Naples, Fla.)
\nW at Villanova (1\/17), 166-118
\nW at Navy (1\/25), 193-99<\/p>\n

Since last poll:<\/i>
\nW vs. Towson (2\/1), 166-133
\nW vs. St Bonaventure (2\/1), 232-64<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> Big 10 championships (Wednesday through Saturday)<\/p>\n

Penn State stays in the top 25 after beating two mid-major teams.<\/p>\n

24. Arkansas (7-1, 2-1 SEC)
\nPrevious rank: 25<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nNTU Relays (10\/4), first place
\nW at North Texas (10\/5), 207-91
\nW at LSU (10\/19), 180-120
\nW vs. Nebraska (10\/26), 205-95
\nW at Missouri State (11\/9), 203.5-88.5
\nMissouri Invite (11\/21-23)
\nL at Alabama (1\/11), 149-113
\nW vs. Kentucky (at Alabama) (1\/11), 131.5-130.5
\nW vs. Rice (1\/25), 207-86
\nW vs. Clemson (1\/25), 230-19<\/p>\n

Since last poll:<\/i>
\nW vs. Kansas (2\/1), 207-91
\nW vs. Vanderbilt (2\/1), 203-83<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> Southeastern Conference championships (Tuesday through Saturday)<\/p>\n

Arkansas cleaned up in two dual meets against Kansas and Vanderbilt to wrap up the dual-meet season.<\/p>\n

25. Louisiana State (6-4, 1-4 SEC)
\nPrevious rank: Not ranked<\/p>\n

Results<\/b>
\nL vs. Georgia (10\/18), 170.5-118.5
\nL vs. Arkansas (10\/19), 180-120
\nW vs. Tulane (10\/25), 211-89
\nL vs. Auburn (11\/2), 151-87
\nW at South Carolina (11\/9), 168.5-131.5
\nArt Adamson Invitational (11\/21-23)
\nW vs. Southern Methodist (1\/9), 185-112
\nL vs. Texas A&M (1\/18), 168-127
\nW vs. Tulane (1\/31-2\/1), 287-65
\nW vs. Rice (1\/31-2\/1) 223-124
\nW vs. Houston (1\/31-2\/1), 278-75<\/p>\n

Next competition:<\/i> Southeastern Conference championships (Tuesday through Saturday)<\/p>\n

The LSU Tigers make their debut into the top 25 with strong swims over three teams in one weekend to close out their regular season.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

PHOENIX, Arizona, February 17. IT took an entire dual-meet season to do it, but the California Golden Bears women\u2019s team was just knocked off the top spot in the College<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":49930,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"dois","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[3,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-49929","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-featured","category-college"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"\r\nStanford Knocks California Off Top Spot In Final CSCAA Women's Division I Poll - Swimming World<\/title>\r\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\r\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Stanford Knocks California Off Top Spot In Final CSCAA Women's Division I Poll\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"PHOENIX, Arizona, February 17. IT took an entire dual-meet season to do it, but the California Golden Bears women\u2019s team was just knocked off the top spot in the College\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Swimming World\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/SwimmingWorld\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-02-18T00:44:12+00:00\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-02-18T00:45:18+00:00\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Stanford2014.jpg\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"637\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"358\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jeff Commings\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@swimmingworld\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@swimmingworld\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jeff Commings\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\r\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Jeff Commings\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/11d58f31d00d146ff00dc388db73f92a\"},\"headline\":\"Stanford Knocks California Off Top Spot In Final CSCAA Women’s Division I Poll\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-02-18T00:44:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-18T00:45:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/\"},\"wordCount\":2607,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Stanford2014.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"-Home Slider\",\"College\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/\",\"name\":\"Stanford Knocks California Off Top Spot In Final CSCAA Women's Division I Poll - Swimming World\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Stanford2014.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-02-18T00:44:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-18T00:45:18+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Stanford2014.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Stanford2014.jpg\",\"width\":637,\"height\":358,\"caption\":\"Photo Courtesy: Richard Ersted\/StanfordPhoto.com\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Stanford Knocks California Off Top Spot In Final CSCAA Women’s Division I Poll\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Swimming World\",\"description\":\"The Global Leader in Aquatic News\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Swimming World\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SWorld_BLKBKG-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SWorld_BLKBKG-1.jpg\",\"width\":1799,\"height\":900,\"caption\":\"Swimming World\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/SwimmingWorld\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/swimmingworld\",\"https:\/\/instagram.com\/swimmingworldmag\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/SwimmingWorldSPI\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/11d58f31d00d146ff00dc388db73f92a\",\"name\":\"Jeff Commings\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/41770da87bc1f748351b0bd390811207?s=96&d=blank&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/41770da87bc1f748351b0bd390811207?s=96&d=blank&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"Jeff Commings\"},\"description\":\"Jeff Commings is the Senior Writer for SwimmingWorld.com and Swimming World Magazine. He graduated from the University of Texas at Austin with a degree in journalism and was a nine-time NCAA All-American.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/author\/jeffc\/\"}]}<\/script>\r\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Stanford Knocks California Off Top Spot In Final CSCAA Women's Division I Poll - Swimming World","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Stanford Knocks California Off Top Spot In Final CSCAA Women's Division I Poll","og_description":"PHOENIX, Arizona, February 17. IT took an entire dual-meet season to do it, but the California Golden Bears women\u2019s team was just knocked off the top spot in the College","og_url":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/","og_site_name":"Swimming World","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/SwimmingWorld","article_published_time":"2014-02-18T00:44:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-02-18T00:45:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":637,"height":358,"url":"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Stanford2014.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Jeff Commings","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@swimmingworld","twitter_site":"@swimmingworld","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jeff Commings","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/"},"author":{"name":"Jeff Commings","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/11d58f31d00d146ff00dc388db73f92a"},"headline":"Stanford Knocks California Off Top Spot In Final CSCAA Women’s Division I Poll","datePublished":"2014-02-18T00:44:12+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-18T00:45:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/"},"wordCount":2607,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Stanford2014.jpg","articleSection":["-Home Slider","College"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/","url":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/","name":"Stanford Knocks California Off Top Spot In Final CSCAA Women's Division I Poll - Swimming World","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Stanford2014.jpg","datePublished":"2014-02-18T00:44:12+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-18T00:45:18+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Stanford2014.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Stanford2014.jpg","width":637,"height":358,"caption":"Photo Courtesy: Richard Ersted\/StanfordPhoto.com"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/stanford-knocks-california-off-top-spot-in-final-cscaa-womens-division-i-poll\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Stanford Knocks California Off Top Spot In Final CSCAA Women’s Division I Poll"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/","name":"Swimming World","description":"The Global Leader in Aquatic News","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#organization","name":"Swimming World","url":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SWorld_BLKBKG-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SWorld_BLKBKG-1.jpg","width":1799,"height":900,"caption":"Swimming World"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/SwimmingWorld","https:\/\/x.com\/swimmingworld","https:\/\/instagram.com\/swimmingworldmag\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/SwimmingWorldSPI"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/11d58f31d00d146ff00dc388db73f92a","name":"Jeff Commings","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/41770da87bc1f748351b0bd390811207?s=96&d=blank&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/41770da87bc1f748351b0bd390811207?s=96&d=blank&r=pg","caption":"Jeff Commings"},"description":"Jeff Commings is the Senior Writer for SwimmingWorld.com and Swimming World Magazine. He graduated from the University of Texas at Austin with a degree in journalism and was a nine-time NCAA All-American.","url":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/author\/jeffc\/"}]}},"cc_featured_image_caption":{"caption_text":false,"source_text":false,"source_url":false},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Stanford2014.jpg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p56Jja-cZj","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49929","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49929"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49929\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/49930"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49929"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49929"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49929"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}