﻿{"id":48922,"date":"2014-01-30T12:55:54","date_gmt":"2014-01-30T19:55:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/news.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/?p=48922"},"modified":"2014-01-30T12:55:54","modified_gmt":"2014-01-30T19:55:54","slug":"little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/","title":{"rendered":"Little Movement in CSCAA Women&#8217;s Division I Swimming and Diving Coaches Poll"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>PHOENIX, Arizona, January 29. VERY few teams made movement in the College Swim Coaches Association of America&#8217;s poll of the top 25 Division I women&#8217;s swimming and diving teams, with California continuing to reign at the top of the list with another unanimous vote. <\/p>\n<p>The goal of the CSCAA rankings committee is to produce an in-season poll of the 25 best-performing teams in rank order at the time of each poll. The poll is not designed to predict the results of the NCAA Championship, but rather which teams would win head-to-head against other teams in the country. <\/p>\n<p>Specifically, the poll committee does not differentiate between the types of meets, or the status of a specific team in terms of rested versus unrested, when considering votes. Further, rankings are only based on performances that have taken place up to that point in the season, with an emphasis on action from the previous poll. <\/p>\n<p><i>Swimming World<\/i> has been invited as a media member to participate in the polling process, and has a vote in each poll. Jeff Commings serves as Swimming World&#8217;s representative on these weekly conference calls.<\/p>\n<p><b>1. California (6-0, 4-0 Pac 12)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: 1<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nW at Oregon State (9\/27), 161-95<br \/>\nW vs. Washington State (10\/4), 164-89<br \/>\nW vs. Florida (10\/19-20), 238-210<br \/>\nW vs. Wisconsin (11\/1), 163-111<br \/>\nUNLV Fall Invitational (11\/21-23)<br \/>\nUSA Swimming nationals (12\/5-7)<\/p>\n<p><i>Since last poll:<\/i><br \/>\nW vs. Arizona State (1\/24), 229-69<br \/>\nW vs. Arizona (1\/25), 190-109<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Friday at Southern California<\/p>\n<p>Last weekend&#8217;s dual meets showed off Cal&#8217;s amazing diversity across many strokes and distances.<\/p>\n<p><b>2. Georgia (9-0-1, 4-0-1 SEC)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: 3<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nW vs. Kentucky (9\/25), 165-98<br \/>\nW vs. Wisconsin (10\/4-5), 182-136<br \/>\nW vs. Georgia Tech (10\/15), 187-88<br \/>\nW at LSU (10\/18), 170.5-118.5<br \/>\nW at Florida (11\/7), 162-138<br \/>\nW vs. Emory (11\/15), 137-73<br \/>\nAuburn Invitational (11\/22-24)<br \/>\nW vs North Carolina State (1\/4), 186-113<br \/>\nTie at Texas A&#038;M (1\/10), 150-150<br \/>\nW at Texas (1\/11), 157.5-142.5<\/p>\n<p><i>Since last poll:<\/i><br \/>\nW vs. Tennessee (1\/25), 177.5-114.5<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Saturday vs. Alabama<\/p>\n<p>A fast time in the 1000 freestyle by Brittany MacLean and some notable swims from others on Georgia&#8217;s roster gave the Bulldogs some staying power in the top three.<\/p>\n<p><b>3. Texas A&#038;M (7-0-1, 3-0-1 SEC)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: 2<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nW at Vanderbilt (10\/12), 154.5-98.5<br \/>\nW vs. Texas (10\/18), 152-148<br \/>\nW at Missouri (11\/1), 159-118<br \/>\nArt Adamson Invitational (11\/21-23)<br \/>\nW vs. Rice (12\/20), 158-96<br \/>\nTie vs. Georgia (1\/10), 150-150<br \/>\nW vs. SMU (1\/11), 174-110<\/p>\n<p><i>Since last poll:<\/i><br \/>\nW vs. Houston (1\/16), 159-125<br \/>\nW at Louisiana State (1\/18), 168-127<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Saturday vs. North Texas<\/p>\n<p>With the Aggies not putting many of their swimmers in their best events in the past two dual meets, Texas A&#038;M did not put up times that would have kept them in the No. 2 spot this week.<\/p>\n<p><b>4. Stanford (7-0, 4-0 Pac 12)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: 4<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nW vs. San Jose State (9\/26), 138-100<br \/>\nW vs. Washington State (10\/3), 147-104<br \/>\nW at Oregon State (10-25), 170-88<br \/>\nW vs. Wisconsin (11\/2), 201-85<br \/>\nArt Adamson Invitational (11\/21-23)<br \/>\nW at Texas (1\/4), 154-146<\/p>\n<p><i>Since last poll:<\/i><br \/>\nW vs. Arizona (1\/24), 157-138<br \/>\nW vs. Arizona State (1\/25), 148-68<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Friday at UCLA<\/p>\n<p>A strong senior class, and a big win in the 200 free by Lia Neal over Arizona&#8217;s Margo Geer kept the Cardinal steady in this week&#8217;s poll.<\/p>\n<p><b>5. Southern California (5-0, 4-0 Pac 12)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: 5<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nW at Washington State (10\/18), 146-116<br \/>\nSMU Classic (10\/18-19), first place<br \/>\nW at Arizona State (11\/8), 167-128<br \/>\nW at Arizona (11\/9), 167-133<br \/>\nTexas Invitational (12\/5-7)<br \/>\nW vs. Utah (1\/10), 119-91<br \/>\nW vs. Wisconsin (1\/11), 154-103<\/p>\n<p><i>Since last poll:<\/i><br \/>\nIdle<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Friday vs. California<\/p>\n<p><b>6. Texas (8-3, 1-0 Big 12)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: 6<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nW vs. Rice (10\/11), 149-99<br \/>\nW vs. North Carolina (10\/17), 171-129<br \/>\nL at Texas A&#038;M (10\/18), 152-148<br \/>\nW at Indiana (10\/25) 155-141<br \/>\nW vs. Michigan (at Indiana) (10\/25), 210-90<br \/>\nW at Virginia (11\/8-9), 196-157<br \/>\nW vs. Penn State (at Virginia) (11\/8-9), 242-111<br \/>\nW vs. West Virginia (at Virginia) (11\/8-9), 297-41<br \/>\nTexas Invitational (12\/5-7)<br \/>\nL vs. Stanford (1\/4), 154-146<br \/>\nW vs. Auburn (1\/9), 168.5-129.5<br \/>\nL vs. Georgia (1\/11), 157.5-142.5<\/p>\n<p><i>Since last poll:<\/i><br \/>\nIdle<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Friday and Saturday at Texas<\/p>\n<p>Last weekend&#8217;s meet against Texas Christian was canceled, leaving the Longhorns without a meet to make a case for trying to get into the top five.<\/p>\n<p><b>7. Virginia (9-1, 3-0 ACC)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: 9<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nW at Navy (10\/25), 250-50<br \/>\nW vs. Yale (at Navy) (10\/25), 237-63<br \/>\nL vs. Texas (11\/8-9), 196-157<br \/>\nW vs. Penn State (11\/8-9), 226-127<br \/>\nW vs. West Virginia (11\/8-9), 288-50<br \/>\nBuckeye Invitational (11\/22-24)<\/p>\n<p><i>Since last poll:<\/i><br \/>\nW at Virginia Tech (1\/18), 245-125<br \/>\nW vs. Miami (at Virginia Tech) (1\/18), 266-93<br \/>\nW vs. Wisconsin (at Virginia Tech) (1\/18), 225-139<br \/>\nW at Duke (1\/24), 187.5-98.5<br \/>\nW at North Carolina (1\/25), 152-146<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Saturday at North Carolina State<\/p>\n<p>Five wins in the space of a week helped Virginia make a small step upward in the top 10.<\/p>\n<p><b>8. Florida (5-2, 3-1 SEC)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: 8<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nAll-Florida Invite (9\/27-29), first place<br \/>\nW at Missouri (10\/17), 181-109<br \/>\nL at California (10\/19-20), 238-210<br \/>\nL vs. Georgia (11\/1), 162-138<br \/>\nW vs. Alabama (11\/7), 179-113<br \/>\nBuckeye Invitational (11\/22-24)<br \/>\nW vs. Florida State (1\/4), 153-147<\/p>\n<p><i>Since last poll:<\/i><br \/>\nW vs. Florida Atlantic (1\/18), 175-112<br \/>\nW vs. Auburn (1\/25), 173.5-124.5<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Saturday at Tennessee<\/p>\n<p>Florida rebounded from illness to swim strong against Florida Atlantic and Auburn, including a fast 200 fly from Elizabeth Beisel.<\/p>\n<p><b>9. North Carolina (7-2, 1-1 ACC)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: 7<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nW at Virginia Tech (10\/11), 233-120<br \/>\nW vs. Radford (at Virginia Tech) (10\/11), 289-55<br \/>\nW vs. Liberty (at Virginia Tech) (10\/11), 262-87<br \/>\nW vs. James Madison (at Virginia Tech) (10\/11), 272.5-80.5<br \/>\nL at Texas (10\/17), 171-129<br \/>\nW at TCU (10\/18), 200-97<br \/>\nSMU Classic (10\/18-19), third place<br \/>\nW vs Louisville (11\/1-2), 213-140<br \/>\nDowd Nike Cup (11\/21-23)<br \/>\nW vs. Navy (1\/11), 194-97<\/p>\n<p><i>Since last poll:<\/i><br \/>\nL vs. Virginia (1\/25), 152-146<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Friday vs. North Carolina State<\/p>\n<p>A loss to Virginia, a lower-ranked team, hurt North Carolina. The Tar Heels managed to stay in the top 10, however.<\/p>\n<p><b>10. Arizona (7-1, 3-1 Pac 12)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: 10<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nW at Utah (10\/19), 204-96<br \/>\nW vs. UNLV (10\/25), 183-109<br \/>\nW vs. UCLA (11\/8), 151-149<br \/>\nL vs. USC (11\/9), 167-133<br \/>\nW vs. Boise State (11\/23) 172-106<br \/>\nTexas Invitational (12\/5-7)<br \/>\nW vs. Oregon State (1\/3), 195-91<br \/>\nW vs. New Mexico State (1\/3), 202-92<br \/>\nW vs. Northern Arizona (1\/3), 188-107<\/p>\n<p><i>Since last poll:<\/i><br \/>\nL at Stanford (1\/24), 158-137<br \/>\nL at California (1\/25), 190-109<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Friday and Saturday vs. Texas<\/p>\n<p>Arizona had a tough weekend in the Bay Area, losing to higher-ranked teams.<\/p>\n<p><b>11. Indiana (7-3, 4-0 Big Ten)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: 11<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nDennis Stark Relays (10\/11), third place<br \/>\nW at Notre Dame (10\/12), 155-145<br \/>\nL vs. Auburn (at Notre Dame) (10\/12), 180-120<br \/>\nSMU Classic (10\/18-19), second place<br \/>\nW vs. Michigan (10\/25), 181-119<br \/>\nL vs. Texas (10\/25), 158.5-141.5<br \/>\nL vs. Tennessee (11\/1), 171-123<br \/>\nW vs. Kentucky (11\/1), 199-95<br \/>\nUSA Swimming nationals (12\/5-7)<\/p>\n<p><i>Since last poll:<\/i><br \/>\nW vs. Iowa (1\/18), 170-126<br \/>\nW vs. Missouri (at Iowa) (1\/18), 170-121<br \/>\nW vs. Illinois (at Iowa) (1\/18), 193-103<br \/>\nW vs. Purdue (1\/25), 154.5-134.5<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Friday vs. Louisville<\/p>\n<p>Indiana continued to put up solid performances in the past week against Big Ten teams, keeping them right outside the top 10.<\/p>\n<p><b>12. Tennessee (7-0, 2-0 SEC)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: 15<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nW at UNC-Wilmington (9\/27), 178-116<br \/>\nW vs. South Carolina (10\/18), 169-124<br \/>\nW at Louisville (10\/24), 170-130<br \/>\nW at Indiana (11\/1), 171-123<br \/>\nW vs. Kentucky (at Indiana) (11\/1), 214-84<br \/>\nGeorgia Tech Invitational (11\/22-24)<br \/>\nUSA Swimming nationals (12\/5-7)<br \/>\nW vs. Virginia Tech (1\/11), 192-108<br \/>\nW vs. Missouri (1\/11), 192.5-106.5<\/p>\n<p><i>Since last poll:<\/i><br \/>\nL at Georgia (1\/25), 177.5-114.5<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Saturday at Florida<\/p>\n<p>The perfect season the Tennessee women&#8217;s team had enjoyed was broken last week when they faced Georgia at home, but the performances impressed the coaches enough to move the Volunteers up a few spots.<\/p>\n<p><b>13 (tie). Minnesota (7-0, 3-0 Big Ten)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: 13<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nW vs. Arizona State (10\/5), 197-94<br \/>\nW vs. Michigan (10\/11), 174.5-125.5<br \/>\nW at Wisconsin (10\/18-19), 218-152<br \/>\nW at Iowa (11\/1), 194-101<br \/>\nW at North Dakota (11\/9), 179-114<br \/>\nMinneapolis Grand Prix (11\/14-16)<br \/>\nJean Freeman Invite (12\/5-7)<br \/>\nW at Hawaii (1\/11), 164-95<\/p>\n<p><i>Since last poll:<\/i><br \/>\nW vs. North Carolina State (1\/24-25), 190.5-156.5<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Friday and Saturday vs. Wisconsin at Purdue<\/p>\n<p>A two-day meet against North Carolina State showed some strengths and weaknesses in the Minnesota roster, which balanced out enough to keep the Gophers in the top 15.<\/p>\n<p><b>13 (tie). Louisville (6-2, 2-0 American)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: 14<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nW vs. Xavier (10\/11), 189-70<br \/>\nSMU Classic (10\/18-19), third place<br \/>\nL vs. Tennessee (10\/24), 170-130<br \/>\nL at North Carolina (11\/1), 213-140<br \/>\nMichigan Invitational (11\/22-24)<br \/>\nUSA Swimming nationals (12\/5-7)<br \/>\nW vs. Georgia Tech (1\/4), 202-60<br \/>\nW vs. Cincinnati (1\/11), 211-84<br \/>\nW vs. Houston (1\/11), 210-85<\/p>\n<p><i>Since last poll:<\/i><br \/>\nW vs. Notre Dame (1\/18), 171-129<br \/>\nW vs. Kentucky (1\/25), 193-107<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Friday at Indiana<\/p>\n<p>Stars Kelsi Worrell and Tanja Kylliainen were just a couple of big point scorers in the past week of dual meets for the Cardinals.<\/p>\n<p><b>15. Auburn (3-1, 1-1 SEC)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: 12<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nW at Vanderbilt (9\/27), 158-44<br \/>\nDennis Stark Relays (10\/11), first place<br \/>\nW at Notre Dame (10\/12), 180-120<br \/>\nW vs. Indiana (at Notre Dame) (10\/12), 180-120<br \/>\nRoyals Invite (10\/25), unscored<br \/>\nAuburn Invitational (11\/22-24)<br \/>\nL at Texas (1\/9), 168.5-129.5<\/p>\n<p><i>Since last poll:<\/i><br \/>\nL at Florida (1\/25), 173.5-124.5<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Saturday vs. South Carolina<\/p>\n<p>Emily Bos&#8217; double wins against Florida weren&#8217;t enough to keep Auburn from slipping a bit in the rankings.<\/p>\n<p><b>16. Ohio State (8-1, 2-0 Big Ten)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: 19<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nW at Kentucky (10\/11), 195-104<br \/>\nW vs. Kenyon (10\/25), 191-99<br \/>\nW vs. Cleveland State (11\/1), 252-48<br \/>\nW vs. Denison (11\/1), 251.5-48.5<br \/>\nW vs. Virginia Tech (11\/1), 191-109<br \/>\nL at Purdue (11\/8), 157-143<br \/>\nW vs. Northwestern (11\/8), 211-89<br \/>\nW vs. Ohio (11\/9), 193-106<br \/>\nBuckeye Invitational (11\/22-24)<br \/>\nW at Toledo (1\/11), 206.5-93.5<\/p>\n<p><i>Since last poll:<\/i><br \/>\nKenyon Winter Invite (1\/24-25)<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Friday and Saturday vs. Michigan and Nebraska<\/p>\n<p>Swimming against some mid-major Division I schools, as well as teams in Division III, Ohio State looked strong at the Kenyon Invite. The Buckeyes missed a chance to ride that meet victory when the swimming portion of the dual meet against Ball State and Eastern Michigan was canceled.<\/p>\n<p><b>17. UCLA (7-1, 4-1 Pac 12)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: 16<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nW at San Diego (10\/19), 184.5-101.5<br \/>\nW vs. Santa Barbara (11\/1), 198-99<br \/>\nW vs. Oregon State (11\/1), 179-77<br \/>\nW vs. Florida Gulf Coast (11\/1), 201-98<br \/>\nL at Arizona (11\/8), 151-149<br \/>\nW at Arizona State (11\/9), 183-113<br \/>\nUNLV Fall Invitational (11\/21-23)<br \/>\nTexas Invitational (12\/5-7)<br \/>\nW vs. Utah (1\/11), 157-134<\/p>\n<p><i>Since last poll:<\/i><br \/>\nW at Washington State (1\/17-18), 275-147<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Friday vs. Stanford<\/p>\n<p>The Bruins made short work of Washington State on the road to keep themselves in a steady place in the top 20.<\/p>\n<p><b>18. Purdue (7-0, 4-0 Big Ten)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: 18<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nW at Miami (Ohio) (10\/18), 177-116<br \/>\nIndiana Intercollegiates (10\/26), first place<br \/>\nW vs. Notre Dame (11\/1), 155.5-144.5<br \/>\nW vs. Northwestern (11\/8), 202-97<br \/>\nW vs. Ohio State (11\/8), 157-143<br \/>\nBuckeye Invitational (11\/22-24)<br \/>\nW at Hawaii (1\/4), 146-91<br \/>\nW vs. Michigan (1\/10), 164.5-135.5<br \/>\nW vs. Michigan State (1\/11), 167-125<\/p>\n<p><i>Since last poll:<\/i><br \/>\nL at Indiana (1\/25), 154.5-134.5<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Friday and Saturday vs. Minnesota and Wisconsin<\/p>\n<p>Despite losing to Indiana, Purdue put up a good enough fight that coaches kept them at No. 18 this week.<\/p>\n<p><b>19. Penn State (3-2, 0-0 Big Ten)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: 17<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nW vs. West Virginia (10\/18), 152-102<br \/>\nL at Virginia (11\/8-9), 226-127<br \/>\nL vs. Texas (at Virginia) (11\/8-9), 242-111<br \/>\nTexas Invitational (12\/5-7)<br \/>\nUnscored meet vs. North Carolina (in Naples, Fla.)<\/p>\n<p><i>Since last poll:<\/i><br \/>\nW at Villanova (1\/17), 166-118<br \/>\nW at Navy (1\/25), 193-99<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Saturday vs. St. Bonaventure and Towson<\/p>\n<p>Penn State stays in the top 20 with two convincing dual meet wins.<\/p>\n<p><b>20. Michigan (5-4, 2-3 Big Ten)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: 21<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nW vs. Iowa (9\/27), 185-111<br \/>\nL at Minnesota (10\/11), 174.5-125.5<br \/>\nL at Indiana (10\/25), 181-119<br \/>\nL vs. Texas (at Indiana) (10\/25), 210-90<br \/>\nW at Toledo (11\/1), 221-79<br \/>\nMichigan Open (11\/22-24)<br \/>\nUSA Swimming nationals (12\/5-7)<br \/>\nOrange Bowl Classic (1\/3)<br \/>\nL at Purdue (1\/10), 164.5-135.5<br \/>\nW at Northwestern (1\/11), 172-128<br \/>\nW vs. Notre Dame (at Northwestern) (1\/11), 168-132<br \/>\nW vs. Rutgers (at Northwestern) (1\/11), 219-81<\/p>\n<p><i>Since last poll:<\/i><br \/>\nIdle<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Friday vs. Nebraska and Ohio State at Ohio State<\/p>\n<p><b>21. North Carolina State (0-2, 0-1 Big Ten)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: Not ranked<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nAll North Carolina Invite (10\/4-5)<br \/>\nW at Virginia Tech (10\/19), 171-129<br \/>\nL at Florida State (10\/25), 157-143<br \/>\nW vs. Georgia State (at Florida State) (10\/25), 239-61<br \/>\nW vs. Duke (11\/8), 168-121<br \/>\nW vs. Miami (11\/8), 207-77<br \/>\nW vs. UNC-Wilmington (11\/9), 166-112<br \/>\nDowd Nike Cup (11\/21-23)<br \/>\nL at Georgia (1\/4), 186-113<br \/>\nW vs. Villanova (1\/10), 175-104<br \/>\nL at Minnesota (1\/24-25), 190-156<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Friday at North Carolina<\/p>\n<p>North Carolina put up some of its top times of the dual meet season on the road against Minnesota to get back into the top 25.<\/p>\n<p><b>22. Arkansas (7-1, 2-1 SEC)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: 23<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nNTU Relays (10\/4), first place<br \/>\nW at North Texas (10\/5), 207-91<br \/>\nW at LSU (10\/19), 180-120<br \/>\nW vs. Nebraska (10\/26), 205-95<br \/>\nW at Missouri State (11\/9), 203.5-88.5<br \/>\nMissouri Invite (11\/21-23)<br \/>\nL at Alabama (1\/11), 149-113<br \/>\nW vs. Kentucky (at Alabama) (1\/11), 131.5-130.5<\/p>\n<p><i>Since last poll:<\/i><br \/>\nW vs. Rice (1\/25), 207-86<br \/>\nW vs. Clemson (1\/25), 230-19<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Saturday vs. Kansas and Vanderbilt<\/p>\n<p>Arkansas showed no mercy on visiting teams last weekend, keeping Rice and Clemson in the double digits in terms of points.<\/p>\n<p><b>23. Alabama (5-1, 2-1 SEC)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: 22<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nW at Delta State (9\/20), 242-50<br \/>\nW vs. Florida State (10\/12), 179-121<br \/>\nL at Florida (11\/7), 179-113<br \/>\nAuburn Invitational (11\/22-24)<br \/>\nW vs. Arkansas (1\/11), 149-113<br \/>\nW vs. Kentucky (1\/11), 152-110<\/p>\n<p><i>Since last poll:<\/i><br \/>\nW vs. Emory (1\/25), 178-110<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Saturday at Georgia<\/p>\n<p>Alabama will wrap up their dual-meet portion of the season this weekend against the reigning national champions.<\/p>\n<p><b>24. Notre Dame (6-4, 1-0 ACC)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: 25<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nDennis Stark Relays (10\/11)<br \/>\nL vs. Auburn (10\/12), 180-120<br \/>\nL. vs. Indiana (10\/12), 155-145<br \/>\nL at Purdue (11\/1), 155.5-144.5<br \/>\nW at Pittsburgh (11\/9), 193-107<br \/>\nW vs. Virginia Tech (at Pittsburgh) (11\/9), 162-138<br \/>\nW vs. Valparaiso (11\/15), 219-60<br \/>\nW vs. Wisconsin (11\/15), 171-126<br \/>\nHawkeye Invitational (12\/6-8)<br \/>\nL vs. Michigan (at Northwestern) (1\/11), 168-132<br \/>\nW vs. Northwestern (1\/11), 160-140<br \/>\nW vs. Rutgers (1\/11), 206-94<\/p>\n<p><i>Since last poll:<\/i><br \/>\nL at Louisville (1\/18), 171-129<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Friday and Saturday at Shamrock Invitational<\/p>\n<p>Emma Reaney took down a former conference rival in the 200 breast and won two other events as one of a few bright spots to Notre Dame&#8217;s loss to Louisville.<\/p>\n<p><b>25. Wisconsin (3-7, 1-0 Big Ten)<br \/>\nPrevious rank: Not ranked<\/p>\n<p>Results<\/b><br \/>\nL at Georgia (10\/4-5), 361-275<br \/>\nL vs. Minnesota (10\/18-19), 438-302<br \/>\nL at California (11\/1), 163-111<br \/>\nL at Stanford (11\/2), 201-85<br \/>\nW at Northwestern (11\/15), 162-136<br \/>\nL at Notre Dame (11\/16), 171-126<br \/>\nTexas Invitational (12\/5-7)<br \/>\nL at Southern California (1\/11), 154-103<br \/>\nW at Virginia Tech (1\/17-18), 203-164<br \/>\nL at Virginia (at Virginia Tech) (1\/17-18), 225-139<br \/>\nW at Miami (at Virginia Tech), (1\/17-18), 252-101<\/p>\n<p><i>Next competition:<\/i> Friday and Saturday vs. Michigan at Purdue<\/p>\n<p>After many weeks out of the poll, the Badgers return to the top 25 after strong performances on the road against Virginia and Virginia Tech.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>PHOENIX, Arizona, January 29. VERY few teams made movement in the College Swim Coaches Association of America&#8217;s poll of the top 25 Division I women&#8217;s swimming and diving teams, with<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":45394,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"dois","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[3,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-48922","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-featured","category-college"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v24.3 (Yoast SEO v24.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\r\n<title>Little Movement in CSCAA Women&#039;s Division I Swimming and Diving Coaches Poll - Swimming World<\/title>\r\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\r\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Little Movement in CSCAA Women&#039;s Division I Swimming and Diving Coaches Poll\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"PHOENIX, Arizona, January 29. VERY few teams made movement in the College Swim Coaches Association of America&#8217;s poll of the top 25 Division I women&#8217;s swimming and diving teams, with\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Swimming World\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/SwimmingWorld\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-01-30T19:55:54+00:00\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Georgia-200-Medley-relay-09-NCAA-SD-0771.jpg\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2387\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"920\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jeff Commings\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@swimmingworld\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@swimmingworld\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jeff Commings\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\r\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Jeff Commings\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/11d58f31d00d146ff00dc388db73f92a\"},\"headline\":\"Little Movement in CSCAA Women&#8217;s Division I Swimming and Diving Coaches Poll\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-01-30T19:55:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-01-30T19:55:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/\"},\"wordCount\":2334,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Georgia-200-Medley-relay-09-NCAA-SD-0771.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"-Home Slider\",\"College\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/\",\"name\":\"Little Movement in CSCAA Women's Division I Swimming and Diving Coaches Poll - Swimming World\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Georgia-200-Medley-relay-09-NCAA-SD-0771.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-01-30T19:55:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-01-30T19:55:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Georgia-200-Medley-relay-09-NCAA-SD-0771.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Georgia-200-Medley-relay-09-NCAA-SD-0771.jpg\",\"width\":2387,\"height\":920,\"caption\":\"Photo Courtesy: Peter H. Bick\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Little Movement in CSCAA Women&#8217;s Division I Swimming and Diving Coaches Poll\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Swimming World\",\"description\":\"The Global Leader in Aquatic News\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Swimming World\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SWorld_BLKBKG-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SWorld_BLKBKG-1.jpg\",\"width\":1799,\"height\":900,\"caption\":\"Swimming World\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/SwimmingWorld\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/swimmingworld\",\"https:\/\/instagram.com\/swimmingworldmag\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/SwimmingWorldSPI\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/11d58f31d00d146ff00dc388db73f92a\",\"name\":\"Jeff Commings\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/41770da87bc1f748351b0bd390811207?s=96&d=blank&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/41770da87bc1f748351b0bd390811207?s=96&d=blank&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"Jeff Commings\"},\"description\":\"Jeff Commings is the Senior Writer for SwimmingWorld.com and Swimming World Magazine. He graduated from the University of Texas at Austin with a degree in journalism and was a nine-time NCAA All-American.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/author\/jeffc\/\"}]}<\/script>\r\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Little Movement in CSCAA Women's Division I Swimming and Diving Coaches Poll - Swimming World","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Little Movement in CSCAA Women's Division I Swimming and Diving Coaches Poll","og_description":"PHOENIX, Arizona, January 29. VERY few teams made movement in the College Swim Coaches Association of America&#8217;s poll of the top 25 Division I women&#8217;s swimming and diving teams, with","og_url":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/","og_site_name":"Swimming World","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/SwimmingWorld","article_published_time":"2014-01-30T19:55:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2387,"height":920,"url":"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Georgia-200-Medley-relay-09-NCAA-SD-0771.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Jeff Commings","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@swimmingworld","twitter_site":"@swimmingworld","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jeff Commings","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/"},"author":{"name":"Jeff Commings","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/11d58f31d00d146ff00dc388db73f92a"},"headline":"Little Movement in CSCAA Women&#8217;s Division I Swimming and Diving Coaches Poll","datePublished":"2014-01-30T19:55:54+00:00","dateModified":"2014-01-30T19:55:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/"},"wordCount":2334,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Georgia-200-Medley-relay-09-NCAA-SD-0771.jpg","articleSection":["-Home Slider","College"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/","url":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/","name":"Little Movement in CSCAA Women's Division I Swimming and Diving Coaches Poll - Swimming World","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Georgia-200-Medley-relay-09-NCAA-SD-0771.jpg","datePublished":"2014-01-30T19:55:54+00:00","dateModified":"2014-01-30T19:55:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Georgia-200-Medley-relay-09-NCAA-SD-0771.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Georgia-200-Medley-relay-09-NCAA-SD-0771.jpg","width":2387,"height":920,"caption":"Photo Courtesy: Peter H. Bick"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/little-movement-in-cscaa-womens-division-i-swimming-and-diving-coaches-poll\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Little Movement in CSCAA Women&#8217;s Division I Swimming and Diving Coaches Poll"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/","name":"Swimming World","description":"The Global Leader in Aquatic News","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#organization","name":"Swimming World","url":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SWorld_BLKBKG-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SWorld_BLKBKG-1.jpg","width":1799,"height":900,"caption":"Swimming World"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/SwimmingWorld","https:\/\/x.com\/swimmingworld","https:\/\/instagram.com\/swimmingworldmag\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/SwimmingWorldSPI"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/11d58f31d00d146ff00dc388db73f92a","name":"Jeff Commings","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/41770da87bc1f748351b0bd390811207?s=96&d=blank&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/41770da87bc1f748351b0bd390811207?s=96&d=blank&r=pg","caption":"Jeff Commings"},"description":"Jeff Commings is the Senior Writer for SwimmingWorld.com and Swimming World Magazine. He graduated from the University of Texas at Austin with a degree in journalism and was a nine-time NCAA All-American.","url":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/author\/jeffc\/"}]}},"cc_featured_image_caption":{"caption_text":false,"source_text":false,"source_url":false},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/vmrw8k5h.tinifycdn.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Georgia-200-Medley-relay-09-NCAA-SD-0771.jpg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p56Jja-cJ4","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48922","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48922"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48922\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/45394"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48922"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48922"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48922"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}