{"id":302293,"date":"2018-03-24T08:01:11","date_gmt":"2018-03-24T15:01:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/?p=302293"},"modified":"2018-03-27T07:11:51","modified_gmt":"2018-03-27T14:11:51","slug":"ncaa-mens-championships-tritonwear-analyzes-100-back","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.swimmingworldmagazine.com\/news\/ncaa-mens-championships-tritonwear-analyzes-100-back\/","title":{"rendered":"NCAA Men’s Championships: TritonWear Analyzes 100 Back"},"content":{"rendered":"

By TritonWear.<\/em><\/p>\n

The men\u2019s 100 back was anyone\u2019s race; the difference between the top and eighth seed was a mere 0.22 seconds. The final results weren\u2019t that much different. Though there was a wider gap between first and eight place, NC State\u2019s Coleman Stewart<\/strong> and Texas\u2019 John Shebat<\/strong>\u2019s battle for gold was determined by a mere 0.01 seconds.<\/p>\n

Shebat went into the race hard, clocking in the fastest split on the first lap. He matched Stewart stroke per stroke, producing exactly the same DPS, but at a faster rate, giving him the early lead. However, he was not able to maintain his faster stroke rate past the first lap.<\/p>\n

Overall, Shebat went for slower strokes with higher efficiency, while Stewart went for less efficient strokes at a faster rate.<\/p>\n

Their individual strategies clearly worked well for them, each using their strengths to their advantage. Shebat\u2019s strokes propelled him farther than Stewart\u2019s but Stewart\u2019s stroke speed was enough for him to swim a faster split in the last 75. However, this was not enough to offset Shebat\u2019s earlier lead, with Stewart still 0.08 seconds behind him on the final turn.<\/p>\n

The final 25 made all the difference. For the most part, they were both fairly consistent in their stronger metrics \u2013 Shebat\u2019s DPS and Stewart\u2019s stroke rate. However, Shebat\u2019s DPS suffered a significant drop on the last lap. Meanwhile Stewart managed to maintain his stroke rate through to the end, getting him to the wall just one hundredth of a second before Shebat. The outcome of this race may have been different if Shebat had been able to hold onto his DPS, or compensated for the drop with an increased stroke rate.<\/p>\n

Another contributing factor to Stewart\u2019s win was the fact that he spent more time underwater off each turn. A lengthy time underwater isn’t necessarily an advantage in itself, unless this time is spent with maximum efficiency. Stewart succeeded in doing this, using his strong underwater dolphin kicks to speed off the walls. Because his strokes aren’t as efficient, the distance he gained off the walls benefitted him more than an early breakout would have.<\/p>\n

Takeaways<\/h3>\n

A key takeaway from this race is the importance of optimizing race strategy to each athlete\u2019s strengths, and staying consistent in this strategy. Shebat and Stewart had different strategies, but they finished a fraction of a second away from each other. What ultimately gave Stewart the advantage was his consistency. Shebat\u2019s fast start gave him a considerable lead, but pacing himself a little better could have reserved enough energy in the end to maintain his stroking power.<\/p>\n

To dive into the numbers of each athlete yourself, use the interactive board below to see exactly how they performed across all metrics.<\/p>\n