Court of Arbitration for Sport to Rule on Jessica Hardy’s Suspension; FINA, WADA File Appeals Against Hardy; Hardy’s Attorney Responds – Updated

Updated May 29 afternoon

LAUSANNE, Switzerland, May 29. WHILE Jessica Hardy may have won the first step in getting her career back on track with a suspension reduction, she still faces some obstacles as FINA and WADA have joined forces to fight the American Arbitration Association's decision to reduce Hardy's suspension.

In a press release distributed by the Court of Arbitration for Sport, FINA and WADA, the organization stated that "Both the International Swimming Federation (FINA) and the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) have filed appeals at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) against a decision of the American Arbitration Association (AAA) dated 2 and 4 May 2009 in which the US swimmer Jessica Hardy was declared ineligible for a maximum period of one year, provided that the athlete's qualification for the 2012 Olympic Games would not be barred by the IOC's application of Rule 45 of the Olympic Charter (ineligibility for the next Games of a person having been declared ineligible for more than six months)."

The release went on to say that the appeals request that Hardy's suspension be moved back to a period of two years.

Hardy's attorney Howard Jacobs responded with the following statement:

"As neither Jessica Hardy nor myself have received the Statements of Appeal filed by FINA and WADA, we do not yet know on what possible basis the appeal has been filed. While Jessica is obviously disappointed by this development, she takes comfort in the fact that her case was already heard over a period of many days by a very experienced panel of CAS arbitrators in the United States, who considered all of the evidence and came to a just and well reasoned decision. We are confident that when the same facts are presented to a different Panel of CAS arbitrators, they will agree that the first case was decided correctly.

In addition, we note that both WADA and FINA have requested the entire case file from USADA. We hope that after these institutions have had an opportunity to actually review the facts of the case, they will both agree that the decision of the first panel of CAS arbitrators in the United States was both just and well reasoned, and will dismiss the appeals that they have filed.

Jessica Hardy has already endured 10 months of torment and heartache, which included missing the 2008 Olympic Games, as a result of a positive test which was determined by the first panel of CAS arbitrators to have been caused by a contaminated supplement. She looks forward to returning to competition at the end of her suspension."

Just as a reminder, AdvoCare and Hardy still have pending lawsuits regarding the AAA-deemed contaminated supplement issue. From a legal standpoint, this issue has yet to be resolved.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

Welcome to our community. We invite you to join our discussion. Our community guidelines are simple: be respectful and constructive, keep on topic, and support your fellow commenters. Commenting signifies that you agree to our Terms of Use

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x