Purdue vs. Michigan

ANN ARBOR, Michigan, January 16. THE No. 13-ranked University of Michigan men's swimming and diving team knocked off No. 21-ranked Purdue, 134.5-108.5, Sunday evening (Jan. 16) at Canham Natatorium.

Sophomore Miguel Ortiz (Tokyo, Japan/St. Mary's International) led the Wolverines effort, claiming both sprint races in the 50-yard freestyle (20.65) and 100-yard freestyle (45.41).

Michigan found itself chasing Purdue after four events, but three straight podium sweeps gave the Maize and Blue an 18-point lead just past the midway point of the meet. Ortiz led a triumvirate of Wolverines in the 50-yard freestyle, followed by senior Neal Kennedy (Chanhassen, Minn./Chaska) pacing a sweep in the 200-yard individual medley (1:49.93) and junior Dan Madwed (Stamford, Conn./Towson) doing the same in the 200-yard butterfly (1:46.52).

Following Ortiz's win in the 100-yard freestyle, sophomore Connor McCarroll (Portland, Ore./Jesuit) led a Wolverine threesome in the 200-yard backstroke (1:49.42). Purdue pulled back to within 21 points heading into the final event, but a first-place finish in the 200-yard freestyle relay sealed the meet's outcome.

U-M will take a week off before hosting No. 8-ranked Ohio State, Penn State and Northwestern on Jan. 28-29 inside Canham Natatorium. Action will begin at 5 p.m on Friday (Jan. 28) and at 11 a.m. on Saturday (Jan. 29).

The above article is a press release submitted to Swimming World Magazine. It has been posted in its entirety without editing. Swimming World offers all outlets the chance to reach our audience by contacting us at Newsmaster@swimmingworldmagazine.com. However, Swimming World reserves the right to choose what material is posted.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

Welcome to our community. We invite you to join our discussion. Our community guidelines are simple: be respectful and constructive, keep on topic, and support your fellow commenters. Commenting signifies that you agree to our Terms of Use

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x