Swimming in America at a Crossroads

By Jason Marsteller

PHOENIX, Arizona, May 1. THE sport of swimming as it is known in the United States is at a crossroads, much like the rest of the country due to the new economic climate. Just like the automotive industry in the U.S. is facing an interesting dichotomy between future potential and current difficulties, I believe the sport of swimming faces a similar situation right now.

I was all set to write a wonderfully positive column about how I had the chance to take my first vacation since joining Swimming World Magazine, but could not get away from the sport even with a ban on computer use by my wife, Erin.

This column won't be full of daisies though, as the University of Washington cuts have seriously dampened my mood. I'm also not going to touch on the speedsuit controversy, but am not ignorant of the fact that the suits have an impact throughout the various points of this column. Our senior writer John Lohn has already confronted the speedsuit issue earlier this week.

Just a few years ago, I would hazard to guess that someone could choose not to be around the sport of swimming for a few days, and would be able to achieve that goal. But, this past year and the elevation of Michael Phelps into the American pop culture scene has changed all that.

Just to set the stage. My mother, Cindi, absolutely loves the television show the Amazing Race, and when I am in town, I tend to watch the shows that she watches. It gives me a chance to catch up with her, and get away from my standard routine. So, I'm on a personal vacation, trying to keep my mind off the sport for a bit – what harm can watching some Reality TV do me?

There they are, various teams head to the Water Cube in Beijing where they have the choice of either landing simultaneously off the three-meter springboard, or swimming a two-person 400-meter freestyle relay in the Speedo LZR Racer. When I say freestyle, it's truly freestyle. One team even wound up putting on life preservers and pulling themselves along the lane lines in the Olympic warm down pool. It was interesting watching two people take 12-15 minutes to complete the course in comparison to the four-minute times put up by Michael Phelps.

The intrusion into my vacation was actually welcomed, as opposed to the last time I tried to take some personal time and the 108th world record of 2008 set me off (Here's my rant on that issue.)

I was able to extract a kernel of insight from this vacation interruption – swimming has finally elevated to the next level in the American sports landscape. It is on a similar trajectory that golf experienced with the Tiger Woods phenomenon. When Tiger first came onto the scene, golf was in a similar spot as swimming. You had to go looking for it, and the Masters was like the Olympics, as it was the only time you really had no choice to hear about the sport. Once Tiger started making waves, everything changed.

I firmly believe that the sport of swimming in America is in a similar place as golf when Tiger first became a superstar.

However, here is the dichotomy that I see in the sport. While USA Swimming is thriving in the post-Beijing honeymoon, and U.S. Masters Swimming is coming into its own under new leadership, the sport is dying at the collegiate level.

Let's face it, the concept of college athletics being anything but a quasi-professional endeavor at least at the Division I level is over. A similar setup for being paid to play is part of the U.S. government through AmeriCorps. You do volunteer labor, you get your school paid for. That's pretty much what college student-athletes sign on for in the U.S. It is as professional as you can get without agents and contracts involved.

With the current economic climate, athletic departments are doing whatever they can to remain financially solvent as business units within the academic structure.

The sport is truly at a crossroads. Never has it been more popular when measured against its injection into the American pop culture. Even American Idol judge Paula Abdul compared the likely winner (Adam Lambert) of this year's edition of the extremely popular show to Michael Phelps.

"It's like watching the Olympics and you're our Michael Phelps."

That comment was heard by millions of people, and has even pushed the Michael Phelps brand into countless articles mentioning that Abdul compared the two. Before 2008, that reference would likely have been: "It's like watching the Masters and you're our Tiger Woods."

The question is, can the sport capitalize fully on this new level of awareness? Where does the sport on the collegiate scene fit into all of this? Or, is the sport reaching a point where there is enough of a professional career path, similar to basketball, where college is no longer needed en route to becoming a professional swimmer?

Also, what can be done to save college swimming? Are we finally at the point where a national endowment might be a way to take control of the issue? Could pooling our resources to fight the loss of college programs be smarter than letting each individual program fight its own battle?

Or, is the concept that some college coaches believe that a national endowment would give an athletics department more of an excuse to cut a program since it can be funded elsewhere well founded?

Just curious to where our users think the sport of swimming is going.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

Welcome to our community. We invite you to join our discussion. Our community guidelines are simple: be respectful and constructive, keep on topic, and support your fellow commenters. Commenting signifies that you agree to our Terms of Use

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x